Author Topic: Bradbury family  (Read 4358 times)

Offline carol8353

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,603
  • Me,mum and dad and both gran's c 1955
    • View Profile
Re: Bradbury family
« Reply #18 on: Tuesday 02 September 08 17:00 BST (UK) »
Mmmm me too. Do you go from being a housepainter to a bricklayers lab even if you have left your wife and kids........and where's the Charles born South Wales.......or are all the kids in 1901 hers ,but not his?

Carol
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline carol8353

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,603
  • Me,mum and dad and both gran's c 1955
    • View Profile
Re: Bradbury family
« Reply #19 on: Tuesday 02 September 08 17:01 BST (UK) »
Hmmmmm - 1891, Harriett is a WIDOW in Kingston ..

1891 - RG12/610; Folio 86; Page 53

OH B****R  :P

Carol
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Necromancer

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 18,073
  • I've updated my profile ......
    • View Profile
Re: Bradbury family
« Reply #20 on: Tuesday 02 September 08 17:03 BST (UK) »
wonder if the IGI shows the older version of our William ?

nope, and would you adam and eve it ? a gap for 1832 and 1833

 
 C015492   1755-1831
                  1834-1860   
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Galium

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,135
    • View Profile
Re: Bradbury family
« Reply #21 on: Tuesday 02 September 08 17:06 BST (UK) »
Hmmmmm - 1891, Harriett is a WIDOW in Kingston ..

1891 - RG12/610; Folio 86; Page 53

OH B****R  :P

Carol

Doesn't necessarily mean she was a widow.  I notice her son James is a bricklayer. (Harriet is living with James and family in 1901)
UK Census info. Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline Necromancer

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 18,073
  • I've updated my profile ......
    • View Profile
Re: Bradbury family
« Reply #22 on: Tuesday 02 September 08 17:09 BST (UK) »
I only said Hmmmmmmmmm - not QED !   ;)

so we need 1881 location of the older guy's 'wife'  Betsey .........

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Galium

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,135
    • View Profile
Re: Bradbury family
« Reply #23 on: Tuesday 02 September 08 17:13 BST (UK) »
There's a christening of Sarah Pepall 1804 at Petersfield, but no marriages in Hampshire or anywhere else.

Sarah's parents are Thomas and Elizabeth. A Mary (1809) and a Maria (1812)  Pepall were baptised at Kingston, daughters of Thomas and Elizabeth.
UK Census info. Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline carol8353

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,603
  • Me,mum and dad and both gran's c 1955
    • View Profile
Re: Bradbury family
« Reply #24 on: Tuesday 02 September 08 17:14 BST (UK) »
I only said Hmmmmmmmmm - not QED !   ;)

so we need 1881 location of the older guy's 'wife'  Betsey .........



What surname would anyone suggest  :P

Carol
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline carol8353

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,603
  • Me,mum and dad and both gran's c 1955
    • View Profile
Re: Bradbury family
« Reply #25 on: Tuesday 02 September 08 17:16 BST (UK) »
Ahhh I've got her in 1881 watch this space


Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Galium

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,135
    • View Profile
Re: Bradbury family
« Reply #26 on: Tuesday 02 September 08 17:18 BST (UK) »
Deaths Dec Q 1890 
BRADBURY William    48    Kingston    2a   209

 :(
UK Census info. Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk