Author Topic: Ancestry fee increase  (Read 18984 times)

Offline meles

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,472
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry fee increase
« Reply #36 on: Monday 01 September 08 20:17 BST (UK) »
I consider myself repremanded Newfster - nay, slapped down.  :-\

But my point was - there are at least a couple of people on this site that seek (free) info from us and it is clear they are using it for commercial gain.

meles
Brock: Alburgh, Norfolk, and after 1850, London; Tooley: Norfolk<br />Grimmer: Norfolk; Grimson: Norfolk<br />Harrison: London; Pollock<br />Dixon: Hampshire; Collins: Middx<br />Jeary: Norfolk; Davison: Norfolk<br />Rogers: London; Bartlett: London<br />Drew: Kent; Alden: Hants<br />Gamble: Yorkshire; Huntingford: East London

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Necromancer

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 18,073
  • I've updated my profile ......
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry fee increase
« Reply #37 on: Monday 01 September 08 20:29 BST (UK) »
Meles dear chap, I wasnt reprimanding anyone, just gently pointing out to Ricky that the point was being missed.

Interesting in what you say about commercial gain - do the site admin / owners know, thats bad news !

Carole - as ever, most succinct !

 :)
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Online CaroleW

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 73,669
  • Barney 1993-2004
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry fee increase
« Reply #38 on: Monday 01 September 08 20:29 BST (UK) »
Hi

Quote
and it is clear they are using it for commercial gain.

Perhaps the moderator should be advised in these cases.  I have also had my suspicions about some posts but have no proof
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Carlin (Ireland & Liverpool) Doughty & Wright (Liverpool) Dick & Park (Scotland & Liverpool)

Offline PaulineJ

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 16,345
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry fee increase
« Reply #39 on: Monday 01 September 08 20:39 BST (UK) »
But surely if someone were asking for information for their personal financial gain, any person offering/doing lookups has the right to know that, and should be able to take an informed decision as to whether to assist.

And of course, we would be in breach of the terms of use of some resources (freebmd) if it were used for commercial gain.

Pauline



All census look up transcriptions are Crown Copyright http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/
======================================
We are not a search engine. We are human beings.


Offline meles

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,472
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry fee increase
« Reply #40 on: Monday 01 September 08 20:41 BST (UK) »
Meles dear chap, I wasnt reprimanding anyone, just gently pointing out to Ricky that the point was being missed.

I was clearly being too sensitive. My apologies, Newfster.

meles
Brock: Alburgh, Norfolk, and after 1850, London; Tooley: Norfolk<br />Grimmer: Norfolk; Grimson: Norfolk<br />Harrison: London; Pollock<br />Dixon: Hampshire; Collins: Middx<br />Jeary: Norfolk; Davison: Norfolk<br />Rogers: London; Bartlett: London<br />Drew: Kent; Alden: Hants<br />Gamble: Yorkshire; Huntingford: East London

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Necromancer

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 18,073
  • I've updated my profile ......
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry fee increase
« Reply #41 on: Monday 01 September 08 21:06 BST (UK) »
Meles, apology not necessary - no problem.

Ricky - you betcha !
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline wrjones

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,482
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry fee increase
« Reply #42 on: Monday 01 September 08 21:51 BST (UK) »
What no one has mentioned also is that the price of subscription to Ancestry has risen due to the fall in value of the Pound to the Dollar.

Regards
William Russell Jones
Cefn Mawr
Wrexham.
Jones, Griffiths. Stephens, Parry, Gabriel, Conway, Hughes, Evans, Roberts, Lea, Hanmer. Peake, Edwards. Newnes, Davies. Thomas. "Blythin".
All North Wales.
Conway, Durber, Cartlidge, Lovatt, Bebington. Brindley, Sankey, Brunt. Dean. Clewes. Rhodes. Mountford,Walker,Bache, "Gibbons"Hood. Taylor
All Stoke-on-Trent.
Francis - Nantwich Cheshire.
Dennell - Cheshire/Staffordshire.
Talbot-Shropshire
Census Information Is Crown Copyright,from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline jc26red

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,345
  • Census information Crown Copyright.
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry fee increase
« Reply #43 on: Tuesday 02 September 08 00:26 BST (UK) »
ahhh but the pound went up before it went down... and its still high against the dollar.

Don't know how many of you have seen the 2 new databases that have crept in... probably part of the selected "not included new"  - still a very long way from complete but the reasoning behind the basic and premium UK packages

England & Wales Christening Records, 1530-1906 - New! 
England & Wales Marriages, 1538-1940 - New! 

I've got WW for a short while but someone else I know can't search them as it tells her to up her subs  >:(

Jenny
Please acknowledge when a restorer works on your photos, it can take hours for them to work their magic

Please scan at 300dpi minimum to help save the restorers eyesight.

Offline LizzieW

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 11,031
  • I'm nearer to finding out who you are thanks DNA
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry fee increase
« Reply #44 on: Tuesday 02 September 08 00:30 BST (UK) »
Quote
What Newsfer and myself and others are saying, is that there is an increasing number of users of this board who will post numerous lookup requests rather than use the Ancestry access at their library - or pay for it themselves.  In other words - we pay but they gain!!

I think most of us who are regular helpers on Rootschat are aware of the main culprits and we do boycott them as you recommend.  Unfortunately - somebody else then comes along and does it for them so they continue posting and the situation perpetuates

That probably explains some of the rather blunt replies I've seen recently when people have requested look ups, such as "If you look on the 1881 census on Ancestry you'll find what you want to know" etc.  In fact CaroleW sent me a PM advising about such a request - thanks again for the info Carole. ;D

Slightly off topic - What I find a bit surprising, is when I ask for information about say a landmark in a particular town, which I can't find out about other than by visiting or asking someone who lives in the area, and I get no response.  Fortunately, it doesn't happen often, but when it does I am slightly taken aback.  That kind of local knowledge doesn't cost anyone anything and I've usually searched thoroughly on the internet before I requested the information.  Happily today, I got lots of information about a town I was asking about.

Quote
Don't know how many of you have seen the 2 new databases that have crept in..

No not noticed those Jenny, I'll have a look tomorrow.


Lizzie