Author Topic: Good News ! 1911 Census!  (Read 59488 times)

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,904
    • View Profile
Re: Good News ! 1911 Census!
« Reply #162 on: Tuesday 26 August 08 09:22 BST (UK) »
I'm a few + years over 50 and I know where my grandparents were living - both sets within about 20 yards of each other (and their son and daughter both at home  ;)  ). A widower great was living with one set of grandparents, my one set of greats were a bit further along the road and the other great about 1/2 mile away.

For a lot of roving ancestors, they seemed to have settled down by then  :D


Gadget
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=877762.0

Offline lookingforold

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 657
    • View Profile
Re: Good News ! 1911 Census!
« Reply #163 on: Tuesday 07 October 08 20:27 BST (UK) »
Do you suppose Ancestry will have the 1911, or will those of us who use that have to change subscriptions ??   I can't think that Ancestry will be wanting to loose customers !

Had an e-mail today from 'Findmypast', the Official site that will have it. Even their Subscribers are going to have to pay EXTRA to view it as it's a 'pay-to-view' site so it may as well just stay as an on-line site of its own.
Snell Brentford cira 1910: Canada cira 1924

Snell; Southampton 1920

Payne: Old Itchen Ferry Village, Woolston, Southampton Cira 1800 to 1930

Price: HMS Collosus & Victory cira 1900

Ernest Cooper; Cornwall, b about 1880 to 1900; Cornwall

This information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk"

Offline stonechat

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,682
    • View Profile
Re: Good News ! 1911 Census!
« Reply #164 on: Wednesday 08 October 08 06:15 BST (UK) »
Hi

Emails from FindMyPast have indicated that they will be the only site with it at first.

I won't want to pay any extra money for it

I loathe ppv and want subscriptions
Douglas, Varnden, Joy(i)ce Surrey, Clarke Northants/Hunts, Pullen Worcs/Herefords, Holmes Birmingham/USA/Canada/Australia, Jackson Cheshire/Yorkshire, Lomas Cheshire, Lee Yorkshire, Cocks Lancashire, Leah Cheshire, Cook Yorkshire, Catlow Lancashire
See my website http://www.cotswan.com

Offline kerryb

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,934
    • View Profile
Re: Good News ! 1911 Census!
« Reply #165 on: Wednesday 08 October 08 08:03 BST (UK) »
Hmm

I'm still awaiting an email from FindMyPast despite being a subscriber.  I wonder if they are introducing it as ppv to begin with to stop any chance of a repeat of the 1901 release - meltdown.  ::)

Kerry
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Searching for my family - Baldwin - Sussex, Middlesex, Cork, Pilbeam - Sussex, Harmer - Sussex, Terry - Surrey, Kent, Rhoades - Lincs, Roffey - Surrey, Traies - Devon & Middlesex & many many more to be found on my website ....


Offline Nick29

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 6,273
    • View Profile
Re: Good News ! 1911 Census!
« Reply #166 on: Wednesday 08 October 08 08:53 BST (UK) »
Hi

Emails from FindMyPast have indicated that they will be the only site with it at first.

I won't want to pay any extra money for it

I loathe ppv and want subscriptions

Me too !  Subs Credits wouldn't be so bad if they lasted more than about 10 minutes before they expired.  I know I now pay a lot of money for a World subscription, but I don't have to worry about how many pages I'm viewing.  Because of a mis-transcription, I once had to trawl through about 40 pages of census to find my great-grandparents, and I'm glad I wasn't paying per page then.   :o
RIP 1949-10th January 2013

Best Wishes,  Nick.

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline stonechat

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,682
    • View Profile
Re: Good News ! 1911 Census!
« Reply #167 on: Wednesday 08 October 08 23:13 BST (UK) »
YEs those really difficult to find people are a pain - I  have one wh does not appear on the 1901  even though I know where  he was in 1898.

Bob
Douglas, Varnden, Joy(i)ce Surrey, Clarke Northants/Hunts, Pullen Worcs/Herefords, Holmes Birmingham/USA/Canada/Australia, Jackson Cheshire/Yorkshire, Lomas Cheshire, Lee Yorkshire, Cocks Lancashire, Leah Cheshire, Cook Yorkshire, Catlow Lancashire
See my website http://www.cotswan.com

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,904
    • View Profile
Re: Good News ! 1911 Census!
« Reply #168 on: Wednesday 08 October 08 23:22 BST (UK) »
Although I now subscribe to FindMyPast, I still have a pile of credits left over from the old days.  I wonder if I will be able to use them to view the 1911?


Gadget
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=877762.0

Offline kerryb

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,934
    • View Profile
Re: Good News ! 1911 Census!
« Reply #169 on: Thursday 09 October 08 08:10 BST (UK) »
Good point Gadget, I have quite a stash of them too which now never seem to get used but remain on my account. This may be a good use of them if they don't delete them first.  ::)

Kerry
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Searching for my family - Baldwin - Sussex, Middlesex, Cork, Pilbeam - Sussex, Harmer - Sussex, Terry - Surrey, Kent, Rhoades - Lincs, Roffey - Surrey, Traies - Devon & Middlesex & many many more to be found on my website ....

Offline drodgers34

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 215
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Good News ! 1911 Census!
« Reply #170 on: Monday 20 October 08 00:22 BST (UK) »
Not sure why they would go PPV - I'd have thought it would add extra overhead compared to subscription

--The extra overhead to meter every item viewed.

--The numbe of people getting the info anyway by doing excessive searches - i remember you could download a 1901 extractor from another site which would collate all the searchable info - which gave you most of what you would want to see.

As I see it most people wpuld only want to view the originals for close fmily - either 2 grandparent families or 4 great grandparent families. Older than that is unlikely to be on 1911

Then perhaps sibling families if you are really keen.

Thoase wanting to do one-name  or one place or doing descendent charts would wait for subscription



Plus if they went the subscriptions they have a chance of poaching regular subscribers from ancestry etc - how many people would justify more than one subscription ?