Hello MattD30,
I can clarify, correct and expand your information concerning Smith/Shrubsole marriage at Faversham:
According to the IGI there is a Richard Smith marrying an Elizabeth Thrabsole in Faversham in March 1782 and I wondered if this could be them? Could Thrabsole be a mistrascription of Shrubsole?
Indeed, this was a mistranscription. The entry reads:
Groom: SMITH Richard
Bride: SHRUBSOLE Elizabeth
Event: M 12 March 1782 - by banns
Place: Faversham
Witnesses: Samuel Shrubsole, John Holloway
Sources: PR, AD
I am also keen to find out if they had any other children before Elizabeth...
I believe the marriage above to be the correct couple at Whitstable as there are no children baptised at Faversham. It also appears that Elizabeth, the daughter, born during 1782, would have been the first child of the couple, if the ones from Faversham are correct. You would need to find a settlement/removal for the couple at Whitstable to verify the connection to Faversham or a Will of one of the parents to help tie it all together.
...when Richard and Elizabeth died.
There is no appropriate burial at Faversham for either Richard or Elizabeth at any time between 1794 and 1863. So burial is possibly at Whitstable or Seasalter.
Elizabeth Shrubsole is likely this child:
Child: SHRUBSOLE Elizabeth
Event: C 22 Feb 1761
Parents: Nathaniel/Elizabeth
Place: Faversham
Source: BT
I am basing this on the fact that this couple also had a Samuel at Faversham during 1760. But, I have to add a cautionary note: There is also a couple at Chartham - Nathaniel and Mary, who also have a Samuel and an Elizabeth just a few years previous to the two mentioned above.
The Shrubsoles of Faversham do track back to the couple at Chartham, who, in turn, originated in Faversham. It is quite a tangled web of people.
I have more, but will put it on separate postings to keep all of the information straight.
Sincerely,
Zacktyr