Hi, Raylen.
Yes, that is my amendment. There is no Richard Spins anywhere else, so it must be Spiers, I would imagine. I have not had sight of the actual record itself, as I do not have World membership of Ancestry until I win the Lottery! The actual document apparently states his age, place of birth, etc, which would verify that it really is Richard Spiers - and it might give a snippet or two extra!
Thanks very much for your help; it is much appreciated.
Best wishes, Bluesky.