I wouldn't say the 1861 census entry is tenuous or contains supposition
RG9 585 folio 125
Snells Newick Sussex
Sarah Budgen Head Widow 64 Charwoman Fletching Sussex
William Greaves Grandson 8 Scholar Brighton Sussex
If the information is correct then this William Greaves (of the right age and birthplace for your William Greaves) is Sarah Budgen's grandson.
Newick parish registers are not covered by the IGI or the BVRI.
I can't see that the Sussex Weald website holds any Newick parish registers either.
I'm not sure what the coverage of the Sussex FHS baptism index is for Newick. It seems to indicate it has entries in the 1850s
http://www.sfhg.org.uk/baptismsN.htmlSince you have checked with the Sussex FHS does this mean they have full coverage of Newick baptisms for the 1850s but neither a William Greaves or a William Budgen baptism is there? Because if they do have full coverage and he is not there then obviously it is not useful persuing Newick further and perhaps Brighton parishes need to be looked at next.
Have you got from the Sussex FHS the baptism entries for all of Sarah Budgen's children both as Harland and Budgen in Newick?
If you have, then you have proved that Christiana Budgen is Sarah's daughter?
The 1851 census then gives you
1851 census HO107 1646 folio 132
75 West Street Brighton Sussex
Thomas Bryer 46 Head Married Cabinet maker Somerset
Mary Bryer 50 Wife Married Croydon Surrey
Christina Budgen 19 House servant Newick Sussex
William Greaves 18 (S?:L) Porter London Middlesex
Greaves is an exceedingly rare surname in Sussex. There were 10 Greaves in the whole of Sussex in 1851, nearly all of them in New Shoreham.
Then you have the likely death in Newick of Sarah's daughter Christiana using the surname Greaves. If the death is in Newick and of a woman of the correct age and even better the death is registered by Sarah (though deaths this earlier are often registered by any local woman who was experienced in nursing her neighbours) then you surely have a very strong connection.
Deaths Dec 1853
Greves Christiana Lewes 2b 81
On the 1851 census there were 104 girls in Sussex with a first name of Christian* ages ranging of course, from 80 to 1.
Supposition's dictionary definition is 'assumption, belief without proof, conjecture'.
On Rootschat I endlessly bang on about family history research should bann the words assumption, presumption and supposition, but in this case you have several pieces of evidence, two census entries (three if you include the 1841 census entry in Newick where Christian Budgen is present in Sarah's household) Christiana Budgen's baptism in Newick? and potentially her death registration as Christiana Greves (sic) in Newick. Placed against the rareness of the Greaves surname in Sussex and the relatively rareness of the name Christiana (Budgen is a little more common at least 75 in 1851 but still a relatively unusual surname) and you place the evidence you have so far in a context. That to me doesn't seem like it is fulfilling the dictionary definition of supposition or that the evidence is tenuous. It isn't as conclusive as you would like with a birth certificate (and the information on them is not always correct), but then there is no evidence that the birth was registered.
If you want to check with the two local registration offices in case the entry has not made it into the GRO index they are Brighton
http://www.brighton-hove.gov.uk/index.cfm?request=b1113986or Lewes for Newick
The Register Office, Southover Grange, Southover Road, Lewes, BN7 1TP.
Tel: 01273 475589. Fax: 01273 488073.
E-mail:
lewes.registrar@eastsussex.gov.ukIf there is no birth certificate then the only final evidence of birth can come from a baptism, but neither would/will give you further information on William's father. The information on him from the 1851 census, is more then you would be likely to get from either of those two sources.
Lack of birth registration was not punishable by a fine until 1875. The most likely births to not be registered would be those that were illegitimate births which took place in towns and cities and where the mother may have moved shortly afterwards, the birth not being picked up by either registrar in two adjacent districts, since the onus was on them to try to track down births to oversee their registration.
It will be interesting to see what Christiana died of, because if she is Sarah's daughter (and there is no evidence of her on later censuses) then she died very young.
Regards
Valda