Trying to find Healen MUNDAY - Completed

[meles]

Thanks for the 'heads up', Nell. 

I think the solution is to go to my local LDS family history centre and see if they have Hartley Witney records. If not, then it's the l-o-n-g schlep to Kew. 

But I'm gonna solve this! 

meles

[Daisypetal]

Hi,

How about this?


1861  RG9/707  f.37  p.22  &  f.38  p.23  Hartley Wintney
Blue Row

Charles MONDAY   Head    Mar    55    Ag Lab            Hants  Har Wintney
Mary        "  "        Wife    Mar    49    Monthly nurse     "  "           "  "
Ann     MONDAY    Daur      Un    28    Farm work          "  "           "  "

James Hny MONDAY  Daurs son    7    Scholar
Jabez MONDAY            " "    " "    5       "  "
Hilon Wm MONDAY        " "  " "     1


marriage
Ann MONDAY    Dec Q 1861    Hartley Wintney    2c  296
David LOVELOCK with same details


1871  RG10/1233  f.66  p.4  Hartley Wintney
Winchfield

David LOVELOCK    Head  Mar  41    Labourer      Hants Winchfield
Ann                      Wife  Mar  38                        "  "    Hartley Wintney
Jabez   MONDAY     Son          14    Labourer        "  "          "  "
Elon LOVELOCK "     Son          11                       "  "        "  "
Charles LOVELOCK   Son           8                         "  "        "  "
Jane        "  "        Daur          75                        "  "    Crookham
Emma    "  "          Daur           3                          "  "        "  "
John       "  "         Son            10m                       "  "    Winchfield
Mary     "  "          Daur           7                            "  "    Hartley Wintney


Regards
Daisy

[meles]

By George, I think she's got it! 

Thank you so much, Daisy - I am delighted! 

meles

[Barbara F]

Brilliant daisy 

I can now stop thinking about this man!


Barbara

Edit:  I wonder if that birth reg I found in 1860 is Healans?  The date and place fit!

[Daisypetal]

Pleasure to help

Barbara I think you're right about the birth, I also think the typed image shows it to be Helan

Helan MUNDAY    Mar Q 1860    Hartley W    2c  170


So now it's just the 1881 census and his marriage missing


Daisy

[meles]

I think you're right - does say Helan.

I wonder what other version of his name was used in 1881 and his marriage? 

And where did Wm come from in 1861 - did the enumerator simply not believe the forename?

meles

[Daisypetal]

I've really tried but I can't find either the 1881 or his marriage

Yes I think the enumerator must have changed the name, the original Hilon under the cross through does not look that clear so I guess he just thought it was an error or a badly written Wm.

Daisy

[meles]

Nor can I.

I guess that they may not have married (well, perhaps they did some time after the period we've all been looking at) - wouldn't have been the first time. 

Perhaps somehow got missed out of the census  - also not for the first time. 

meles