Hi Jim & China.
Here are 2 more efforts - one with dress detail and a bigger one of the original.
If the baby is who I am thinking it might be, he was born in 1882, so this photo would have been taken around 1884, which means the lady is sporting a very old hairstyle. I am pretty sure there was not a lot of money around in that family so perhaps this could account for the hairstyle being of a much earlier fashion. That top lump certainly doesn't look to be her own hair. Also her hands look very battered - I don't think she was a lady who had an easy life.
Do you think the baby is a boy or girl? Also the baby looks a bit 'slumped' - perhaps younger than 2 years?
Thanks for helping.
Maggie