You have been busy, Deb!
I think I agree with you about Mary: Births June 1841 HARROWAY Mary Ann Uxbridge 3 304
Also about the Susan WOODCOCK birth - had not got as far as thinking of that one!
Also think this one is right: Emma Harroway June 1843 Uxbridge
vol 5 p 327
Well done finding them on the 1861 census. I admit they had nutty ways of spelling their name, but basically they stayed in the same place, which has been a great help. Imagine if they had moved around too!

Yes, perhaps Jane had already been married once, but I think you are being very diplomatic. On my own family tree several of them seem to have thought it wasn't worth getting married unless the relationship had been fully tried and tested beforehand, so the ALLOWAYs may have felt the same way! Strict Victorian morality does not seem to have been as widespread as we are led to believe

By the 1871 census I suppose the children had gone their separate ways:
1871
Uxbridge, Hillingdon
2 Canal Street
Emma WITTLE head mar 28 Boatman's wife b Hillingdon
Mary ALLOWAY dau 9 ...she nust be Mary Ann/Margaret who married Wm Grafton
Eliza ALLOWAY dau 6
George ALLOWAY 6 ( aka George Whittle)
Hannah WITTLE dau 4months
all born Hillingdon
a few houses away ... Jane Alloway widow, 60 b Uxbridge
Thank you for all this. You are a star.
Edwina
