Author Topic: Date the photograph  (Read 3417 times)

Offline Mourne

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 30
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Date the photograph
« Reply #9 on: Wednesday 30 April 08 22:14 BST (UK) »
Thank you all for your thoughts. I so want this person to be my Grandomther, as this is what I was told, on her death cert is Pulmonary Tuberculosis Exhaustion, maybe this is why she looks older than 32 yrs

Mourne

Offline Rabbit B

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 5,215
  • 1937 - 2012
    • View Profile
Re: Date the photograph
« Reply #10 on: Wednesday 30 April 08 23:10 BST (UK) »
Welcome to rootschat Mourne,

What a lovely avatar that is! 

Now about your picture, this lady is certainly older than the age that you have given.

I would estimate late 40's, but having said that, have you noticed the deterioration in the facial musculature around the mouth, the thinning lips are an aging thing as well.

Rabbit B  ;D
Conning/London
Wareham/Winchester
Hart/Cambridgeshire
Burns/Byrne/Liverpool and Ireland
Nibbs/London
Brealey/Staffordshire
Melbourn/Melbourne/Cambridgeshire
Hoyle/Liverpool
Relf/Sussex

Offline PrueM

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,637
  • Please don't try to PM me :)
    • View Profile
Re: Date the photograph
« Reply #11 on: Thursday 01 May 08 00:30 BST (UK) »
Sorry Mourne, I think that might be wishful thinking  :-\ ;)

The lady does not look like an ill young woman, she looks like a healthy mature woman.  If she had TB she would look more wasted and pale.  This lady has all the signs of a face going southwards (not wishing to be rude!  ;D  ) - slight jowls, heavy brows, lines around mouth etc.  Her hands are not the hands of a young woman, either.

Combine all this with the fairly confident dating information of 1915-1920 or so, and I really think that, unfortunately, this is not your grandmother  :-\

Offline PaulaToo

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 6,254
  • Me 'n Gerry
    • View Profile
Re: Date the photograph
« Reply #12 on: Thursday 01 May 08 00:44 BST (UK) »
Perhaps not grandmother, then, but could it be HER mother ?
There's nearly always a grain of truth in family legends, nearly always...  ::) sometimes even two grains...
Bartlett/Henley on Thames
Caponhurst/Buckinghamshire and?
Denchfield/North Marston/Bucks
Webb/Winchester
Mathias/Pembroke/Pembroke Dock
John/Pembroke/Pembroke Dock
Smith/Portsmouth/Portsea
Purchas/Bucks and?
Olliffe/Bucks


Offline Tricia_2

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,270
  • "Family ~ link to our past, bridge to our future"
    • View Profile
Re: Date the photograph
« Reply #13 on: Thursday 01 May 08 00:52 BST (UK) »
Apart from the colour of her hair, I would say that she looks older even than 50.
To me, she looks nearer 60.
Worcs / Glos: Neal Neale Jeynes Jeens Geans Harris Roper Ropier Colley Dyer Heeks Bayzand Hampton Bishop Cole Elton Littlehales McGowan
Glamorgam: Hampton Thornton Svombo Swambo Swanbo Keefe O Keefe Shanahan Shannon Doyle Maldoon Muldoon Davies Llewellyn Jones
Birmingham: Neale Sarjant Cole Hiley Berridge Tirebuck

Offline chinakay

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 13,553
  • Our housegoof
    • View Profile
Re: Date the photograph
« Reply #14 on: Thursday 01 May 08 05:30 BST (UK) »
There's another thing...TB gives you all kinds of pulmonary problems which result in poor oxygenation. Poor oxygenation leads to loss of brain and cardiac function and a whole bunch of stuff ....including poor fingernail and hair growth. In fact, TB is noted for hair loss.

This woman looks like she has a very healthy head of hair. Lovely hair.

Just another 2 cents' worth....your piggybank is going to be full soon ;D

Cheers,
China
Moore/Paterson~Montreal
Moore/Addison~New Brunswick
Jubb/Kerr~Mirfield~Halifax~Moffatt
Williams~Dolwyddelan

King~Bedfordshire~Hull
Jenkins~Somerset
Sellers~Hull

Offline Mourne

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 30
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Date the photograph
« Reply #15 on: Thursday 01 May 08 19:59 BST (UK) »
Thank you all for your comments.

But can anyone put a year to the photo rather than the person.

Mourne


Online jc26red

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,359
  • Census information Crown Copyright.
    • View Profile
Re: Date the photograph
« Reply #16 on: Thursday 01 May 08 20:12 BST (UK) »

Combine all this with the fairly confident dating information of 1915-1920 or so..................

You have been given a very good date for the photo and I would agree with Pru

Jenny
Please acknowledge when a restorer works on your photos, it can take hours for them to work their magic

Please scan at 300dpi minimum to help save the restorers eyesight.

Offline mosiefish

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,837
    • View Profile
Re: Date the photograph
« Reply #17 on: Thursday 01 May 08 20:23 BST (UK) »
Hi,

Is the photographers name written anywhere? 

Just thought I should ask in case it had been cropped off the bottom.

Mo
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Lancs: Harrison, Entwistle, Devine, Grundy, Ashworth, Freeman, Jackson, Rushton
Cornwall: Rich, Binney, Peak(e)
Devon: Martin, Walter(s)