Hi Sue
Vanessa suggested I might have more to add. At this point I have to say that most of my information going back to the late 1700s and early 1800s has come from IGI records. There are precious few other records to go by; those that lived past 1841 are usually (but not always) to be found in census data. To some extent with the Pardoes their family names are a clue, passed down through the family, but there are a lot of common names in different branches of the family, the usuals such as William, John, Joseph, James, Thomas, George, Samuel amongst the males and Jane, Ann, Elizabeth, Betty, Sarah amongst the women, to just mention a few. I have a little verbal ancestral data but almost all these sources are no longer available.
I believe Joseph Pardoe 1758 and Jane Brook 1761 had 12 children with some names recycled for chidren that died young. There were 2 Bettys, 2 Williams, John, George, Mary, Jenny, Joseph, Elizabeth, Thomas and Richard, born in the years between 1782 and 1804.
I have had a look about for your names. You mention Jane Pardoe 1833 married to James Freeman- what is the source for this one? The nearest Jane I can find was the daughter of John Pardoe 1802 and Jane Foxall 1801 and she was christened in April 1834. Is this she?
I see where you come from with Ann, christened 27 April 1777. Jane would have been abouit 16 then and they were not married until 4 years later; I dismissed this for that reason. Equally there was a Joseph Pardoe born 29 May 1814 but Jane would have been 53 by now and, though not impossible, I made the decision he was not in this family either. It could well be that they are both in the same family and Jane bore 14 children. Equally there could be two Joseph Pardoes and Janes and there could be two famililies which I have mixed! Eventually, with nothing more to go on, who knows?
I do not know if this is any help. It would be interesting to follow your thoughts on all this.
Regards
Arlen