Author Topic: Censuswhack  (Read 135021 times)

Paul E

  • Guest
Re: Censuswhack
« Reply #126 on: Saturday 19 February 05 00:04 GMT (UK) »
All good things must come to an end (or so they say).  Fawlty Towers stopped before it became boring and, in its same (modest :)) way, Censuswhack sadly closes its doors to new entrants.

But WHAT a time we've had!  Who could have imagined some of the wonderful combinations of christian and surnames that are hiding out there in the censuses? 

And, en route, we've sidestepped round a few brick walls for Rootschatters in the process.

What lessons have we learned?

- Never trust an index
- Never trust your parents when it comes to the names they give you
- Never give up looking
- Never underestimate a Rootschatter
- The Census can be FUN!
- I don't know how to produce a table that lines up properly on a Rootschat thread

So, we come therefore to the final tally:

RootsChatter   Points to Date
 janed            1 
 tabitha         31
 emilysiobhan 25
 Hackstaple    11
 broakham    14
 kat               1 
 gennig         27
 Berlin-Bob    1
 lizdb             1
 pom              8
 peterb          2
manchester rambler 18
ros fornaro   1
chui 3

So, the Reginald Dalby Welch [/b] (1881) - look 'im up - Trophy goes to

TABITHA!  Well done!
Honourable mentions, of course, for gennig and emilysiobahn!

May your censuses forever be whacked!

Paul

Paul E

  • Guest
Re: Censuswhack
« Reply #127 on: Wednesday 23 February 05 07:19 GMT (UK) »
Oh dear ... it seems from PMs I've had that Censuswhack has been sorely missed (but not quite as much as Rootschat yesterday :)).

To start you off on another trawl, lets start low and work higher, and welcome the Ba*tard Peck's from Stoke Damarel, in Devon. 

Just a refresher of the rules I am sure many Rootschat users will have heard of 'Googlewhacking', where the object is to put two words into the Google search engine and come up with only one result?

Well, how about Census Whacking using whatever indexing programmes for the censuses you've got to hand?

The rules are simple: see if you can find

- a surname that occurs in only ONE family in any census
- a first name that only one person in the country has
- an occupation that only one person in the country has

Good Whacking!

Paul





Offline Rebecca Steele

  • I am sorry but my email address is no longer working
  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 487
    • View Profile
Re: Censuswhack
« Reply #128 on: Wednesday 23 February 05 08:55 GMT (UK) »
Don't know if this counts as its a birth:

Halloween Lucy Troddan born March qtr 1899 Co. Durham

Morgan - Herefordshire, Worcestershire * Bullock - Worcestershire * Taylor - Gloucestershire, Worcestershire * Peverill/all/ell - Middlesex, Brighton, Essex * Knee - Gloucestershire, London area * Brenan - Any area * Steele - Dorset<br /><br />Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Paul E

  • Guest
Re: Censuswhack
« Reply #129 on: Wednesday 23 February 05 09:15 GMT (UK) »
Hi Chui

Wonder if she was born on Halloween and registered in the March Quarter??
Lovely name - well worth a point!  (She'll probably appear in 1901 indexed under Halesowen Trodden!)

Paul


Offline Rebecca Steele

  • I am sorry but my email address is no longer working
  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 487
    • View Profile
Re: Censuswhack
« Reply #130 on: Wednesday 23 February 05 10:15 GMT (UK) »
Hadn't thought of that Paul, she probably was born on halloween! Thanks for the point!!!  :D

Morgan - Herefordshire, Worcestershire * Bullock - Worcestershire * Taylor - Gloucestershire, Worcestershire * Peverill/all/ell - Middlesex, Brighton, Essex * Knee - Gloucestershire, London area * Brenan - Any area * Steele - Dorset<br /><br />Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Manchester Rambler

  • Global Moderator
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 6,608
    • View Profile
Re: Censuswhack
« Reply #131 on: Wednesday 23 February 05 10:25 GMT (UK) »
Brilliant - I needed something to cheer me up!

Soooo....

Let's hear it for the family STINK of Haley Hill in 1901

ANT: Nesbit, Potts; CHS: Gosling (Hazel Grove/Lymm), Hinton (Lymm), Johnson (Hazel Grove), Marsland (Hazel Grove), Massey (Daresbury), Sorton (Warmingham); LAN: Jackson, James, Potts (Manchester/Salford); MAY: Caulfield, Griffin (Leveelick); SAL: Goodwin, Johnson (Bridgnorth), Gregory (Wellington); STS: Goodwin, Gregory, Johnson (Wolverhampton); Hallett (Trysull); SOM: Dowding, James, Jones (Bath)

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Rebecca Steele

  • I am sorry but my email address is no longer working
  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 487
    • View Profile
Re: Censuswhack
« Reply #132 on: Wednesday 23 February 05 10:40 GMT (UK) »
Have got a Bessie Mermaid on the 1891 census  ;D

and a one and only Sunbeam Hawkes on the 1891 census ;D

Morgan - Herefordshire, Worcestershire * Bullock - Worcestershire * Taylor - Gloucestershire, Worcestershire * Peverill/all/ell - Middlesex, Brighton, Essex * Knee - Gloucestershire, London area * Brenan - Any area * Steele - Dorset<br /><br />Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Manchester Rambler

  • Global Moderator
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 6,608
    • View Profile
Re: Censuswhack
« Reply #133 on: Wednesday 23 February 05 23:16 GMT (UK) »
Can we do some matchmaking?  Let's team Bessie up with Charles Fishy of Lincolnshire in 1891.

 ;D
ANT: Nesbit, Potts; CHS: Gosling (Hazel Grove/Lymm), Hinton (Lymm), Johnson (Hazel Grove), Marsland (Hazel Grove), Massey (Daresbury), Sorton (Warmingham); LAN: Jackson, James, Potts (Manchester/Salford); MAY: Caulfield, Griffin (Leveelick); SAL: Goodwin, Johnson (Bridgnorth), Gregory (Wellington); STS: Goodwin, Gregory, Johnson (Wolverhampton); Hallett (Trysull); SOM: Dowding, James, Jones (Bath)

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Paul E

  • Guest
Re: Censuswhack
« Reply #134 on: Wednesday 23 February 05 23:21 GMT (UK) »
Batter Kidger, 1881, might come in handy!