Author Topic: Censuswhack  (Read 135460 times)

Offline KernishKim

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 102
    • View Profile
Re: Censuswhack
« Reply #261 on: Tuesday 19 April 05 00:12 BST (UK) »
You have all got me thinking (again) about a name puzzle thats been bugging me ever since I started this family history lark!! ............. Why are there so few Victorias born in the 19th Century? (My daughters name by the way)
Queen Victoria was on the throne whilst every census we use was being  submitted! But I have yet to come accross one either in my tree or anyone elses! WHY?????
Golder, Mitson, Norwich<br />Wilson, Southwell Notts<br />Curnow,Laity, Cornwall<br />Anderson, Durham<br />Ryce, Scotland

Offline Seren

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 57
    • View Profile
Re: Censuswhack
« Reply #262 on: Tuesday 19 April 05 00:55 BST (UK) »
In 1877 there were hundred of little girls...including one in my family...who were given the name Victoria Jubilee!

Seren
Census Information is Crown Copyright from: www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline KernishKim

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 102
    • View Profile
Re: Censuswhack
« Reply #263 on: Tuesday 19 April 05 01:04 BST (UK) »
HONEST????!!!! Someone told me that Queen Victoria banned her name being used by "The Common People"! - So either your Victoria was a Lady, or that someone was pulling my leg!!!!
Golder, Mitson, Norwich<br />Wilson, Southwell Notts<br />Curnow,Laity, Cornwall<br />Anderson, Durham<br />Ryce, Scotland

Offline Seren

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 57
    • View Profile
Re: Censuswhack
« Reply #264 on: Tuesday 19 April 05 21:51 BST (UK) »
Honest...meant 1887...but still honest...and if she was a lady she's the only one that's ever existed in my family!!

Seren
Census Information is Crown Copyright from: www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline Bee

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,940
    • View Profile
Re: Censuswhack
« Reply #265 on: Tuesday 19 April 05 22:05 BST (UK) »
Not the census but on the IGI is FLINT STONE Born 1790 in Norfolk, I wonder if he went on to have a son called Fred ;D

Bee
Dinsdale, Ellis, Gee, Goldsmith,Green,Hawks,Holmes,  Lacey, Longhorn, Pickersgill, Quantrill,Tuthill, Tuttle & Walker,  in E & W Yorks, Lincs, Norfolk & Suffolk. Census information is Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Paul E

  • Guest
Re: Censuswhack
« Reply #266 on: Tuesday 19 April 05 22:28 BST (UK) »
Why are there so few Victorias born in the 19th Century? (My daughters name by the way)

Hi Mary

In relative( :)) terms you are right - Victoria is not a particularly common name.  You can see from the results below how it increases in popularity across the later part of the C19th.


  1901 England Census  11,474     
  1891 England Census  5,224     
  1881 England Census  3,191     
  1871 England Census  2,421     
 
I wouldn't think many people would have a Victoria in their tree   - but I like Seren's Victoria Jubilee!

cheers

Paul
       

Offline Manchester Rambler

  • Global Moderator
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 6,608
    • View Profile
Re: Censuswhack
« Reply #267 on: Wednesday 20 April 05 00:22 BST (UK) »
I remember seeing a birth announcement in the Manchester Evening News back in 1977 (Silver Jubilee year), which even as a kid I thought awful: Juby Lee!

MR

ANT: Nesbit, Potts; CHS: Gosling (Hazel Grove/Lymm), Hinton (Lymm), Johnson (Hazel Grove), Marsland (Hazel Grove), Massey (Daresbury), Sorton (Warmingham); LAN: Jackson, James, Potts (Manchester/Salford); MAY: Caulfield, Griffin (Leveelick); SAL: Goodwin, Johnson (Bridgnorth), Gregory (Wellington); STS: Goodwin, Gregory, Johnson (Wolverhampton); Hallett (Trysull); SOM: Dowding, James, Jones (Bath)

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Paul E

  • Guest
Re: Censuswhack
« Reply #268 on: Wednesday 20 April 05 07:27 BST (UK) »
Uggh!  You're not kidding, MR!

(Weren't those wierd prism-shaped frozen ices that were always a pain to get into called Jubilees, or am I misremembering?)

Paul

Offline Seren

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 57
    • View Profile
Re: Censuswhack
« Reply #269 on: Wednesday 20 April 05 08:26 BST (UK) »
almost right Paul....it was a Jubbly!

Seren
Census Information is Crown Copyright from: www.nationalarchives.gov.uk