« Reply #2 on: Monday 23 June 14 16:09 BST (UK) »
Hi Darren,
Sorry, none of your names mean anything. We've previously been in contact. Warwickshire probably has about 4 times the number of HANDS as Worcestershire. There are also HANDS in the Home Counties.
You sound a little unsure of your data. From 1837, when certificates became available, you really must have certificates of your direct ancestors. Or failing that church records for marriages, which usually works out cheaper if they on-line. Index records are not accurate enough although they can be used to exclude people. Pre-1837 you get what you get from church records, in the main. Don't forget wills and probate and various tax returns which place people geographically at a set point in time.
You probably need to access the Berkshire county baptism index. FamilySearch may prove useful, but you never know how complete it's records are. If you are lucky you may find parish registers in CD form or on-line.
Regards
Mike
HANDS, HANDES, HANNS, HANNES, HANNE, HANNON (Yardley to Bromsgrove)
MIL(L)WARD, COTTERIL, CLULEE, IZOD, HASSALL, TODD, STRATTON, JAKEMAN, JENNINGS, MOLE, ALLCOCK PINFIELD north Worcestershire
WATERS, Thurzo, Sutherland> Bishopswearmouth, Durham
GARDNER, Solihull;
HUMPHRIES & HUMPHREYS, Meifod, Montgomeryshire>Bilston, STS> Manchester & Texas + Kansas, USA
JAKENS, BIRD, CRAPPER Bury, HIGGINBOTHAM, HORRIDGE, CUNDIFF, Lancs
LEO, Galway/Tipperary, & CARROLL, Carlow Ireland