Author Topic: "What makes these people tick" EGO?  (Read 10105 times)

Offline Tephra

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,846
  • Veni, veni, veni Locamovae cum me
    • View Profile
Re: "What makes these people tick" EGO?
« Reply #27 on: Tuesday 29 January 08 04:18 GMT (UK) »

On another note, (and speaking generally) we each have 4 grand-parents, 8 great grandparents, 16 g-great grandparents, 32 g-g-great grandparents........
surely no-one thinks that by the time we get back that many generations our ancestors are exclusive???
Cheers,
Leonie.



And that's it in a nutshell isn't it........     ;D ;D ;D


Barbara

Onley/Only/Olney In Islington.<br />Wallwork In Bolton and Walkden<br />Lamb In Bolton and Ireland<br />Grundy In Bolton<br />Blackledge In Bolton<br />Osbaldeston  ?? ??<br />Barnett in Islington<br />Binyon in Islington
Kitchen in Bolton
Parker in Bolton

Online Erato

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,917
  • Old Powder House, 1703
    • View Profile
Re: "What makes these people tick" EGO?
« Reply #28 on: Tuesday 29 January 08 04:23 GMT (UK) »
This issue seems to come up over and over again and I find it hard to understand why it does.

Genealogy is a hobby for me and so is shell collecting.  The same kind of pointless discussions come up among shell collectors.  Some people have small, very focused collections – just one or a few  families, all their shells in perfect condition – gem quality specimens.  Many of them purchase shells from dealers.  Others, and I am one, collect anything including total trash – broken shells, beach worn, whatever.  Different people have different goals for shell collecting.  Some collect them almost as art objects.  In my case, I collect everything, never buy shells, am interested in them as living animals as well as dead specimens, and attempt to document the species’ distribution among other things.  Purists would find my collection revolting, but so what.  It’s a matter of taste and interest, not a matter of one way of collecting being  the right way and any deviation being wrong.

The same holds for genealogy/family history.  It’s a hobby and people’s interests, goals and approaches to it vary.  What is there to get upset about?
Wiltshire:  Banks, Taylor
Somerset:  Duddridge, Richards, Barnard, Pillinger
Gloucestershire:  Barnard, Marsh, Crossman
Bristol:  Banks, Duddridge, Barnard
Down:  Ennis, McGee
Wicklow:  Chapman, Pepper
Wigtownshire:  Logan, Conning
Wisconsin:  Ennis, Chapman, Logan, Ware
Maine:  Ware, Mitchell, Tarr, Davis

Offline LoneyBones

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,491
  • Wot, me worry?
    • View Profile
Re: "What makes these people tick" EGO?
« Reply #29 on: Tuesday 29 January 08 05:11 GMT (UK) »
Absotively, posolutly  ;D
Horses for courses.
Just imagine the alternatives.....
Zero population growth to start with  :-\, doing housework   ::)(for the non-population) watching TV :o ..............
Life would be so boring.   ???
Cheers,
Leonie.
Direct matriarchal line; ENNIS-Yeatman-Cooper-Papps-Ryland-Lechford/Luxford-Bagshaw-Henriett
ENNIS-Thomas-Bonnin-Aldridge-Williams-Harding-Brown.
ENNIS-Davis/Davies-Buck-Oakley-
JONES-Roberts-Handy-Ross-Warrillow-Eagles-Cotterill-Bailey.
JONES-Walton-Grayson-Stobbs-Baldwin-Ibbotson-Scott.
JONES-Goodwin-Parker-Instant-Hubbard-Hancock-Skinner.

STILL LOOKING FOR: Elizabeth Ann Balfour ENNIS nee DAVIS. Disappeared in Adelaide, South Australia. 1881.

Offline Boongie Pam

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • *******
  • Posts: 2,550
  • Pa is Scottish, Ma is Welsh, Nose is Roamin'
    • View Profile
Re: "What makes these people tick" EGO?
« Reply #30 on: Tuesday 29 January 08 10:39 GMT (UK) »
I like the discussion - it's a confessional for me.  I'm a name collector  :)

I do it because I want to make contact.  I'm pals with so many distant rellies - in fact not even related really!

But I've had brickwalls come tumbling thanks to witnesses at weddings, notifiers on death certs.  These people aren't related but when I research them I see some distant connection that helps me place my ancestors geographically.  And lo the wall comes a tumbling.

It really helps in the 1800 to 1845 period because of the, I've moved back into the middle 1700s thansk to strangers that touched my ancestors lives.

I think our ancestors knew more of their distant relatives than we do now because they didn't adopt soap opera characters!

P :)
UK Census info. Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
~~~~~~~~~~~

Dumfrieshire: Fallen, Fallon, Carruthers, Scott, Farish, Aitchison, Green, Ryecroft, Thomson, Stewart
Midlothian: Linn/d, Aitken, Martin
North Wales: Robins(on), Hughes, Parry, Jones
Cumberland: Lowther, Young, Steward, Miller
Somerset: Palmer, Cork, Greedy, Clothier

Online intermittently!


Offline LoneyBones

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,491
  • Wot, me worry?
    • View Profile
Re: "What makes these people tick" EGO?
« Reply #31 on: Tuesday 29 January 08 11:00 GMT (UK) »
Just imagine if I never researched wedding witnesses  ???
I would never have found my g-g-grandfather Yeatman!!!
Great grandfather Yeatman was a brickwall til I got the marriage cert. and researched the witness Henry Monk. Turned out to be his b-in-law. led me back to the parish records and there were the whole family. Yeatman wasn't in the FreeBMD yet but Monk was  ;D
Let's hear it for sideways research.
Cheers,
Leonie.
Direct matriarchal line; ENNIS-Yeatman-Cooper-Papps-Ryland-Lechford/Luxford-Bagshaw-Henriett
ENNIS-Thomas-Bonnin-Aldridge-Williams-Harding-Brown.
ENNIS-Davis/Davies-Buck-Oakley-
JONES-Roberts-Handy-Ross-Warrillow-Eagles-Cotterill-Bailey.
JONES-Walton-Grayson-Stobbs-Baldwin-Ibbotson-Scott.
JONES-Goodwin-Parker-Instant-Hubbard-Hancock-Skinner.

STILL LOOKING FOR: Elizabeth Ann Balfour ENNIS nee DAVIS. Disappeared in Adelaide, South Australia. 1881.

Offline sue7

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 16
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: "What makes these people tick" EGO?
« Reply #32 on: Tuesday 29 January 08 11:41 GMT (UK) »
Hi Everyone
Well after reading all the posts I must say I am really embarrassed I actually brought it up, :-[ :-[ :-[

I don't consider myself some sort of Diva who and I certainly so share my information quite willingly, and I also have made some wonderful contacts through distant relatives,

Maybe its time for me to come out of my dusty cobweb room, surrounded by ghost's of the past in the form of certificates etc,

In finishing I must say nice to have a healthy discussion with Rootschatters and being a newbie, advice will be taken on board

Thankyou  Sue :)



Offline dollylee

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 916
    • View Profile
Re: "What makes these people tick" EGO?
« Reply #33 on: Tuesday 29 January 08 11:57 GMT (UK) »
Don't be embarrassed for bringing  it up.  It was a good question and brought out all the different reasons people do this.

It's some times hard to find someone you searched for forever and finally tracked down to be flung off on a far branch of another family tree.  Also, I some times grunt and stammer and swear because I am sure the other person didn't sweat the blood and tears I did in finding the relative and he is closer to me!!!  But that only reinforces all the right reasons to share when you can give sources and proof so others can check it out easily for themselves and be confident it is right.

I am at the point where I don't care if the found people are relatives of mine or not.....just that they are found.  Maybe I need a new hobby

dollylee

Offline Abiam2

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,812
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: "What makes these people tick" EGO?
« Reply #34 on: Tuesday 29 January 08 12:02 GMT (UK) »
Have to join in here!

I am researching the family of my Great Great grand uncle which has led me to his widow's 2nd husband who, with his son from this marriage and his stepson from her marriage to my GGGrand uncle, discovered a large leg bone of a Diprotodon optatum!  The largest herbivorous marsupial known to haved lived - about the size of a hippopotamus and extinct for between 10 and 20,000 years.

If I hadn't continued along the new husbands line I probably would never have found this little nugget as it came to me under his name.  Which all adds to the story I am writing.  I shall go on hunting for his son although not a 'proper' relative because the story of all their lives is so interesting.

I enjoy the frustration and sometimes the excitement of it all and if someone copies my tree willy nilly then they are the ones missing out!

Regards, Abiam

PS.  The Dipro........ was in Australia.




Offline Mum44

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,141
    • View Profile
Re: "What makes these people tick" EGO?
« Reply #35 on: Tuesday 29 January 08 12:27 GMT (UK) »

Abiam - you echoed a thought I have often had - if someone has copied my tree, how on earth do they answer queries they may receive from the next person?

There are things I know because I did the research that aren't necessarily on my tree - the little things about circumstances and side-shoots - which don't affect the big picture but which mean a lot to me.  I keep those things in the files, and the person who uplifted the data doesn't have that - so what if another person asks about it ?  They wont know!

I only put blood relations on the actual tree - but believe me, there are hundreds of add-ons in the files !  Sadly, the add-ons seem to be the ones who hold the nuggets!
Census information is Crown Copyright from TNA.
Titchfield, Hampshire: Reed,  Fielder, Cawte, Goddard.
Kent:  Float,  Cutbush. 
Wallasey, Cheshire: Carroll, Ledsham.
Liverpool : Horsfall, Prescott