I've tracked my GGGM Sarah Cranfield as having been born in Little Thurlow, Suffolk, in approximately 1813 from census records although I can't trace her birth.
I can find a Rebecca Cranfield still in Little Thurlow, born in approx 1811, in the 1871 census.
Again, I can't find a birth record for her.
However, I have found baptism records for a Sarah and Rebecca Cranfield at Little Thurlow in 1829 and 1831 respectively. If it's the right people, I know their parents' names and that they're presumably sisters.
However, this means they were not baptised as children. I've checked and the church had been there for about 600 years, so it's not as if there was nowhere to baptise them as babies! Was it quite common for older children and adults to be baptised?
The only possible marriage certificate I can find for their parents dates to 1827 - was it that the girls could not be baptised because their parents weren't married? Was there a change in church rules?
The latter question arises because their possible mother was not baptised until 1825 (unless it's another sister) and no father is named on her baptism certificate.
Little Thurlow is a very small village so the likelihood of more than one person having the same name is quite small unless closely related and since there's only one Cranfield in the village in 1871, I doubt they were a large local family!
Also, how do I find out where the original parish records are now held? If these baptismal records are on the Familysearch IGI, does this mean all that parish's records are on there so if a record's not on there, it doesn't exist?
Sorry to ask so many questions, but I've reached that foggy no-go area!