... We are in fact a republic, albeit a Royal republic ...
My post was a response to a serious question (genealogically relevant in my view) posed by downside. I attempted to provide information and to adduce some
facts.
Admittedly my own personal views were not hidden in passing

- but it truly was an attempt at a factual answer.
Boggabarrett (I take it from your profile that you are Australian?), it would be entirely inappropriate and arid to turn this WDYTYA thread into a debate re the desirability (inevitability

) of an Australian republic. So I won't respond to your personal views here (but do feel free to post your views as a new thread on the ToT board and I'm sure you will get lots of responses!).
However, in the interests of
accuracy, it really
must be pointed out that your statement quoted above is
wrong.
Australia is not (yet!) "in fact a republic".
Australia most certainly is not "a Royal republic" (something which I regard as an oxymoron) .
Australia is a constitutional monarchy.
Very best regards,
JAP