Author Topic: Walter Noble (1828)  (Read 17053 times)

Offline tulstig

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 660
  • me this year (2010) on El Camino do Santiago
    • View Profile
Re: Walter Noble (1828)
« Reply #63 on: Wednesday 09 February 11 15:43 GMT (UK) »
HI Buzz999

Thanks for the addition. I thought perhaps the trail had gone cold. Thanks for teh new info. Any more you have gratefully received.

Mark
TULLETT (sussex),
LEE(Kent),
DALE(Sussex),
ANDREWS (who knows?),
LINDFIELD/LINFIELD(Sussex),
LANDER (Cornwall),
BLENCOWE (Sussex)
GROUT (Surrey)


All census information: Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline tulstig

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 660
  • me this year (2010) on El Camino do Santiago
    • View Profile
Re: Walter Noble (1828)
« Reply #64 on: Wednesday 09 February 11 15:53 GMT (UK) »
ME again.

Just found a baptism entry on Ancestry for William Nathanial - Parents listd as Richard and Charlotte. As I don't have the exclusive membership I can't see any more details- Anyone able to help?
Cheers
Mark
TULLETT (sussex),
LEE(Kent),
DALE(Sussex),
ANDREWS (who knows?),
LINDFIELD/LINFIELD(Sussex),
LANDER (Cornwall),
BLENCOWE (Sussex)
GROUT (Surrey)


All census information: Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline buzz999

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 12
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Walter Noble (1828)
« Reply #65 on: Wednesday 09 February 11 19:22 GMT (UK) »
i have ancestry i think still, will check it out but don't remember finding william nathaniel before with those parents - what did you put into search?

Offline buzz999

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 12
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Walter Noble (1828)
« Reply #66 on: Wednesday 09 February 11 19:31 GMT (UK) »
Found baptism William Nathaniel Noble 25 May 1788 in parish St Mary at Lambeth, Surrey, parents Richard Noble and Charlotte Noble. Data originally from England Parish Registers 1538 - 1812 - wonder if this register may hold their marriage?


Offline buzz999

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 12
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Walter Noble (1828)
« Reply #67 on: Wednesday 09 February 11 19:56 GMT (UK) »
St Mary at Lambeth is now demolished and used to stand on Lambeth Road at gateway to Lambeth Palace. This must have been their place of living at this time. i have found a marriage record for Richard Noble to a Charlotte Wilson on 12 nov 1780 in St Marylebone Parish - could be them?

Offline tulstig

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 660
  • me this year (2010) on El Camino do Santiago
    • View Profile
Re: Walter Noble (1828)
« Reply #68 on: Wednesday 09 February 11 21:28 GMT (UK) »
Whey hey -looks like they're the ones- another step back in time.

Huge thanks, Buzz999.

Mark
TULLETT (sussex),
LEE(Kent),
DALE(Sussex),
ANDREWS (who knows?),
LINDFIELD/LINFIELD(Sussex),
LANDER (Cornwall),
BLENCOWE (Sussex)
GROUT (Surrey)


All census information: Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline buzz999

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 12
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Walter Noble (1828)
« Reply #69 on: Thursday 10 February 11 19:44 GMT (UK) »
Found this in the Times London for 1812 regarding Richard Noble wine and spirit merchant forming part of a committee taking the West India Dock Company to task - makes for interesting reading about their plans. Copy was quite hard to read in parts but I have done my best to transcribe! Interestingly another one of the members has the surname Cawthorn - perhaps a family member of William Nathaniel's future wife? or coincidence? were they 2 families in the spirit trade perhaps?

The Times London 26 August 1812

Hambro Coffee House Aug 12 1812 – At a meeting this day of the importers of wines and spirits in the Port of London, convened principally for the purpose of taking into consideration the grievous injury and injustice sustained by them, their connections and the Public at large, from the monopoly of the West India Dock Company.
Walker Gray, Esq. in the chair.
The following resolutions were unanimously adopted: -
That security to property, reduced charges and facility to trade as appears by the preamble? to the Act of Parliament for the incorporation of the West India Dock Co., were its professed objects and promised advantages to the Public.
That the warehouses at the West India Docks are very much exposed to the influence of the sun and air and consequently quite unfit for the custody of strong spirits like Rum and moreover that there is not even sufficient accommodation, such as it is, to contain the whole importing: but that a considerable proportion thereof is left exposed for months together in the open air and that during the summer season when protection from the weather is so indispensably necessary.
That independent of the radical objection to the construction of the West India Docks, as far as relates to the custody of Rum, the distance is not only attended with very great inconvenience but the consequent increased expense of carriage is a tax on trade of no inconsiderable magnitude.
That the loss on Rum at the West India Docks by excessive evaporation, leakage, and waste combined with exorbitant charges grows and notorious abuses and mismanagement is not only too great to be any longer submitted to by the Dealers in Rum and their connections but that the said Docks, as far as relates to this important branch of Commerce and Revenue, are justly to be considered as a great Public Evil.
That owing to the frequent and great deficiencies, both in strength and quality of Rums delivered from the West India Dock, the merchants are assailed with perpetual complaints, none the less harassing to them from the consciousness that their connections have such just and serious case to be dissatisfied.
That the merchants, having no other alternative left, are reluctantly compelled for their own complete justification as traders, to resort to this pubic exposure of facts after having so long in vain, endeavored to procure redress by other means.
That a subscription be forthwith entered into to defray the expenses of an application, if necessary, to Parliament, or of such other measures as may be deemed requisite under the present circumstances.
That the Annual Subscription payable on the 1st Jan be entered into and ????? opened for the signatures of the wine and spirit merchants and others interested in that a perpetual fund may be established for the resistance of any future encroachments on their property and just rights, and also for the maintenance of the reputation and property of the Port of London, whether invaded by the monopoly of the West India Dock Co. or in any other manner: and for general purposes of the Wine and Spirit trades that the following Gentlemen do constitute of committee for carrying into effect the objects of this meeting, viz


Messrs   James Arboise      Messrs    Solomon Peile
      Thomas Bradley            Thomas Ramsey
      George Bridges Ald         John Keay
      William George Bunyon      John Scott
      Robert Butcher            Thomas Smith Ald
      William Cawthorn         Anthony Soulby   
      John Gowen            James Stonehouse
      John Gray               John Talver
      William Hayes            John Tennant
      Christopher Idle            William Timson
      R G Johnson            Joshua Watson
      William Mordall            John Wild
      Richard Noble

That a general meeting of the Wine and Spirit trades be held annually on the 1st Wednesday in January in order to receive the report of the Treasurer and to continue the members of the committee or select others in their room as may be deemed necessary by a majority of subscribers then present.
That the ??? of this meeting be given to Walker Gray, Esq. for his able conduct in the chair.
That the above resolutions be published in the newspapers and otherwise at the discretion of the committee.
John Gowen, secretary
Subscriptions received by Mr John Tennant, No 6 Tower Hill, Treasurer or by Mr John Gowen, No 59 Mark Lane, Secretary to the committee

Offline tulstig

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 660
  • me this year (2010) on El Camino do Santiago
    • View Profile
Re: Walter Noble (1828)
« Reply #70 on: Sunday 13 February 11 10:22 GMT (UK) »
Thanks again Buzz999 - interesting reading.

I've been trawling as many sites as I can trying to see if I can add any updates, but am getting quite frustrated. There is a marriage of a Richard Noble to Charlotte Wilson, and a birth of a Richard parents Richard and Phillis but as I don't have the deluxe (or whatever it is) membership I can't check these dates to see if it's our man.
Should I find anything I'll keep you posted.
TULLETT (sussex),
LEE(Kent),
DALE(Sussex),
ANDREWS (who knows?),
LINDFIELD/LINFIELD(Sussex),
LANDER (Cornwall),
BLENCOWE (Sussex)
GROUT (Surrey)


All census information: Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline startt

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 153
  • James Lyon GGG 1790-1858
    • View Profile
Re: Walter Noble (1828)
« Reply #71 on: Sunday 21 August 11 11:54 BST (UK) »
24. At Cambrrwell, Mr. Richard Kemp, a partner in the house of Messrs. Baxter, Kemp, and Noble, St. Mary at Hill.
The European magazine, and London review, Volume 33 1798
No idea which branch of the Kemp's Richard is from.