Hi Ruby
Re: the 1861 Census from Jorose above:
The full location is: Parish of Clifton
Dau: Emily's place of birth is Stapleton (which falls under the regsitration district of Clifton)
Head: William's place of birth in full, is given as Bristol, Gloster
Wife: Catherine's age may actually be 28, rather than 25 - it's not 100% certain either way, but I tend toward 28
So, William born abt 1836/1837 Redcliff Bristol Gloster
Catherine born abt 1833-1836 Basingstoke Hants
Charlotte born abt 1831 Basingstoke Hants, according to the 1871 and 1881 (but see next message)
What prompted a re-look at 1861 was finding the following in 1841 - I believe your William age 5, with his parents and siblings. Note this is yet another spelling variation!
1841: Parish of Stapleton, Hundred of Barton Regis, GloucestershireRef: HO107 / Piece 378 / Book: 13 / Folio 58 / Pg 11
Address: Freeland Cottages
John FUESTER 40, Labourer - N
Ann FUESTER 30 - Y
Joseph FUESTER 7 - N
William FUESTER 5 - NJane FUESTER 15 - Y
Maryann FUESTER 3 - N
Hannah FUESTER 3 days old - Y
and the also in the house is:
Elizabeth VEN 80, Nurse - N
The enumerator has listed all the male children first, then the females, each in descending order of age. There is a big gap between Jane and the next eldest though - this may indicate other children not in the house (boys of age to be working away, or deceased, or perhaps even that Ann is a second wife and Jane is John's from an earlier marriage. Or that Jane is not a daughter but maybe a sister or other relative - though in that case maybe she would have been more likely to be listed 2nd to last - before Elizabeth VEN but after the children of the (presumed) couple, John & Ann.
Regarding the newborn baby, Hannah - I wonder if the parents had a change of heart about her name or else she was enumerated incorrectly - because the only FreeBMD birth I ca see is a Sarah FEUSTER in Jun Qtr 1841 Clifton RD - everything fits to be Hannah of 1841, apart from the name.
Elizabeth VEN is probably there in capacity of Midwife to mother and babe - she may even be a relative.
Probably now, the 1858 Marriage to Catherine, the 1865 Death of Catherine and the 1867 marriage to Charlotte, would be helpful to establish ages, father's names & occupations, witness' and informants. As well as, as Jorose says, to establish the relationship of Charlotte to both William and Catherine
http://www.genuki.org.uk/big/eng/GLS/Bristol/index.htmlhttp://www.genuki.org.uk/big/eng/GLS/Bristol/StMaryRedcliffe/index.htmlhttp://www.genuki.org.uk/big/eng/GLS/Stapleton/index.htmlhttp://www.genuki.org.uk/big/eng/GLS/Clifton/index.htmlSurname variations.........

FUESTER
FUESETER
FEUSTER
FEUESTER
FEWSTER
FURSTER
FESTER
FENESTER
FENSTER
FOSTER
Cheers
AMBLY