Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic: Census Location Identification  (Read 3623 times)

Offline JoMC

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 302
    • View Profile
Re: Census Location Identification
« Reply #18 on: Sunday 04 November 07 09:22 GMT (UK) »
I still can't see how it can be an N - it's not at all like the N in Northumberland and is more like the Ss and Ps on other parts of the page. I just can't find anything that looks remotely like it.

I even did a search on Halls, born Northumberland who were withing 10 years of George in age on the 1851 just to see if any siblings were showing but I didn't find anything positive  :-\

Could it be Pellaw?

Jo
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

Offline johnd

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 15
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Census Location Identification
« Reply #19 on: Sunday 04 November 07 09:26 GMT (UK) »
Not sure about Pellaw - last three letters look like urn to me - can't see a w myself.
Challenging it certainly is!
John

Offline sharmor

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 70
  • Many records held at home for Tyne Valley area
    • View Profile
Re: Census Location Identification
« Reply #20 on: Sunday 04 November 07 13:08 GMT (UK) »
It could be NEWTON HALL just east of Corbridge
Forster, Hall, Yielder ,Robson, Corbridge and st John lee/ parishes.  also researching Harmison/Harmieson. have lots of info on above

Offline johnd

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 15
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Census Location Identification
« Reply #21 on: Sunday 04 November 07 18:51 GMT (UK) »
Well thats a possibility - if the top of the w & t are missing. There is a George Hall bap in 1792 at Bywell St Peter which is the parish for Newton Hall which nearly fits.
So many thanks - I'll try again with their children Jane (b circa 1820) and Thomas (b circa 1822) - George & Elizabeth might had other children but only these two are in evidence in the 1841 Census.
John
Pages: 1 2 [3]