thank you, but I know all of this.
The tent reference is at the end of an 1861 E D for one of the Staffordshire districts.
I don't think you have seasonal coalminers do you?
the families who settled are on the common for a short period of time, but some of the other families, who married into the main one, like the Stackhouses, and the Claytons, seem to have been on the common for longer periods of tme, more so with the Stackhouses.
The thing is, are they gypsies(or travellers) because they are exhibiting some of the same behaviour? Their daughters are marrying with aliases, fathers using mother's maiden names, marrying close relatives of themselves, or their previous partners; seeming to exchange partners within the family, and I am trying to track these interlinked, collateral families as far as possible.
The Claytons have been easy: Charles Whitehouse married Elizabeth Clayton, who called herself and her father Holland, not Clayton, but the Claytons have been easy to find throughout the cenuses, a family of tinkers and licensed hawkers. It's the 1861 census for them that says "in tents." 1861 is, as I'd expect, the first sound reference for them.
Another son, Isaiah Whitehouse, has a daughter Christina ( unknown mother) who marries in 1900 as Stackhouse. Calls her dad Isaiah Stackhouse. The witnesses are William and Mary (nee Perry) Stackhouse. This William seems to be in the 1881 census with the Stackhouse family on the common. As a grand-son, along with two sons from Mary Lees ( previously Mary Stackhouse's ) prevous marriage/ relationship. No mother. And he isn't in the 1891 census.
that's one of the tangles around the marriages of the various sons that I'm trying to decipher.
two other brothers I haven't even begun to decode yet.
Terry