I've been having a scout around and saw references to a Arthur Wolf REEVE(S) bc1837 Dover and, thinking that the names "Arthur" and "Wolf(e)" weren't too common in this area at that time, decided to look further.
1841
Chapel Street, Dover St Mary
Steven REEVE 30 staymaker b.Kent
Sarah 25 b.Kent
Arthur 3 b.Kent
Jane 2 b.Kent
Sarah 1 b.Kent
/
Emily GOODBURN 15 female servant b.Kent
HO107/494 folio 11 page 15
.......................
There is a marriage Stephen REEVE to Sarah Ann WOLFE in Deal 1835
http://www.familysearch.orgUnfortunately, Sarah is deceased by 1851 so unable to ascertain her birthplace but there is a gourp of WOLFE (and variants) baptisms on the IGI at Sandwich St Mary (all with parents Arthur and Ann):
Jane 1807
Sarah Ann 1810
Sarah Ann 1813
George Buckness 1816
John Arthur 1819 (parents Arthur and Sarah)
George Philip 1823
George Buckness caught my eye as I recall the "BUCKMAN" name cropping up in your research and wonder if one or the other ie. BUCKNESS or BUCKMAN is a transcription error for the other?
Here are the parents, Arthur and Ann ............
1841
Sandwich St Mary
Arthur WOLFE 55 b.Kent
Ann 55 b.Kent
HO107/494 folio 14 page 21
........................
1851
Delf Street, Sandwich St Mary
Arthur WOLFE head mar 68 carpenter b.Selling
Ann wife 69 b.Boughton Kent
HO107/1631 folio 106 page 45
.......................
In 1861 Arthur is in Eastry Union Workhouse, a carpenter, age 78 b.Selling, Kent
RG9/539 folio 115 page 11
..................................
It could be significant don't you think?
Casalguidi
