That all sounds good for Nathaniel Hill Cazay it all fits nicely and it was great to see the other two daughters as well it would help explain that gap I'll look for them in the IGIs.
What great progress we've made - thank you!
As far as the Pococks go this is all the info I have on them it is really an unproven link to the Wimble's at the moment but it does seem to fit very nicely:
There was a William Pocock surgeon M.D. of Brixton around this time he had an eldest daughter Annie Florence who married Frederick John Wimble son of F. Wimble Esq. surgeon of East Malling Kent on the 7th Sept 1871 at St Johns, Angell-town, Brixton (The Times, Monday, Sep 11, 1871 )
Here is that marr in Free BMDs:
Marriages Sep 1871
POCOCK Annie Florence Lambeth 1d 396
Wimble Frederick John Lambeth 1d 396
And Mr Wimble's probable death:
Deaths Dec 1907
WIMBLE Frederick John aged 61 Southwark 1d 66
In IGIs but unproven just a listing:
Annie Florence Pocock Christening: 10 APR 1850 Brixton-St Matthew, Brixton, Surrey, England Parents: Father: William Pocock Mother: Ann
proven from IGIs:Marriages:Spouse:FREDERICK JOHN WIMBLE Marriage: 07 SEP 1871 Saint John The Evangelist, Lambeth, Surrey, England
Here they are in the 1881 census Fredk must have been born abt 1848:
Frederick J. WIMBLE Head M Male 33 Gt. Malling, Hampshire, England Colonial Broker Annie Florence WIMBLE Wife M Female 29 Brixton, Surrey, England
Emma SPENCER Visitor MFemale 51 Burgess Hill, Sussex, England Emily HARLEY ServU female 21 Fulham, Middlesex, England Housemaid Domestic
Rachel CLARK Serv U Female 38 Hastings, Sussex, England Cook
I hope it all makes sense it's just my notes from research today.
thanks
Liz
