I'm really shocked by Simon G's comments. Firstly the 'little England' assumption that that virtually everyone watching the BBC must be unalloyed 'English' is clearly way off the mark. And in any case the myth of the pure bred is clearly just that: the English have always been a "mongrel race" - celts, Romans, Picts, Saxons Vikings etc, as well as the much more traceable waves of imigraion and integration in recent centuries. And secondly his view that any story that is not in some way relevant to him and his researchis not worth screening. Agreed there's plenty of rich British heritage to explore, but wouldn't that, over five series be in greater danger of becoming repetitive?
I guess Simon thinks that one bunch of suffering Jews is much the same as another, despite coming from different countries, fleeing to different countries with distinct research issues raised, not to mention the poignancy of the individual stories. So having done Steven Fry there no need to do any others, especially as Simon knows how it all ends... Bit like complaining that having covered the life of one person with an ag lab ancestor there's no need to do any other English stories, as 90% of us descended from ag labs and so our personal circumstances will have been documented on screen.