Author Topic: working out the great greats  (Read 2524 times)

Offline geniecolgan

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ********
  • Posts: 1,344
    • View Profile
Re: working out the great greats
« Reply #9 on: Tuesday 24 July 07 20:46 BST (UK) »
Lizdb,     See .... I told ya! :P :D
 
Genealogy has got it's own rules and they don't match familiar terms.

We all grew up with this thing about not calling someone a grand except grand mother & father. Probably some cultural thing about not putting on airs & graces.

However, I had two Grand Aunt Lou's, one was a small person, the other was portly. So they were called Little great aunt Lou and Big great aunt Lou..... not very flattering :D

jc
"All UK census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk"

Offline Guy Etchells

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 4,632
    • View Profile
Re: working out the great greats
« Reply #10 on: Tuesday 24 July 07 22:53 BST (UK) »
Take a look at
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/%7Eframland/acts/affinity.htm
there is a chart at the foot of the page that may help.
Cheers
Guy
http://anguline.co.uk/Framland/index.htm   The site that gives you facts not promises!
http://burial-inscriptions.co.uk Tombstones & Monumental Inscriptions.

As we have gained from the past, we owe the future a debt, which we pay by sharing today.

Offline pennine

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 237
  • A smile can make some ones day
    • View Profile
Re: working out the great greats
« Reply #11 on: Tuesday 24 July 07 23:10 BST (UK) »
Wow that was informative! Takes a lot of getting ones head around.
One question if I can't marry my adopted son in theory and my husband can't marry my adopted daughter in theory can the two adopted children get married to each other as they are not blood related! And could one of the adopted children marry a natural sibling of the family?
Pennine
Bell, Brodsworth, Felkirk, Wath-Upon-Dearne, Yorkshire<br />Bright, Eyre, Jessop, Wilkinson, Sheffield, Yorkshire<br />Fielding, Lound Retford, Lincolnshire and Sheffield, Yorkshire<br />Law,  Felkirk, Wath-Upon-Dearne, Yorkshire<br />Lister, Flockton, Wath-Upon-Dearne, Yorkshire<br />Mitchell, Langsett, Nr. Penistone Yorkshire.<br />Walton, Cudworth, Barnsley Yorkshire.<br />Stanger, Lincolnshire, Northamptonshire, Yorkshire.<br />Gratwick, London and Kent<br />Fahy, Limerick, Southern Ireland

Offline DudleyWinchurch

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,695
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: working out the great greats
« Reply #12 on: Tuesday 24 July 07 23:21 BST (UK) »
Are you sure that this is not just another of those instances where Britain and the US are two nations divided by the same language?

Longman's Dictionary (British) says great is used to refer to 3 or more generations away direct or two or more generations away indirect.

This fits in with common British usage which is that parents become grand and then great but uncles, aunts, nephews, nieces, etc. only become greats.
McDonough, Oliver, McLoughlin, O'Brien, Cuthbert, Keegan, Quirk(e), O'Malley, McGuirk (Ireland)
Dudley, Winchurch, Wolverson, Brookes (Black Country)
Concannon, Moore, Markowski (Markesky), Mottram, Lawton (Black Country)


Offline dollylee

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 916
    • View Profile
Re: working out the great greats
« Reply #13 on: Wednesday 25 July 07 00:31 BST (UK) »
If you do a google search it seems that this could well be as DudleyWinchurch says.  There seems to be a pretty even split on the usage of great vrs. grand as it applies to aunt, uncle, niece and nephew.

Other sites such as http://www.searchforancestors.com/utility/relationshipterms.html

show that both terms are acceptable.

I find that not only confusing but odd. ;D ;D

Sorry lizdb I was out of line in correcting you.

dollylee

Offline geniecolgan

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ********
  • Posts: 1,344
    • View Profile
Re: working out the great greats
« Reply #14 on: Wednesday 25 July 07 03:14 BST (UK) »
OH Jeez! ???
  just when I thought I'd got it sorted out, now I'm all confused again >:(

Oh well, so long as we know who's who.
Just don't have a transatlantic family like I have. :D :D :D

jc
"All UK census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk"

Offline kimmieto

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 32
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.natio
    • View Profile
Re: working out the great greats
« Reply #15 on: Friday 27 July 07 13:07 BST (UK) »
Thank goodness the software I use to enter my rellies on the computer has a calculator or I would be lost.

Makes for interesting reading too if you stick in the odd person here and there.  Sometimes the wording used to describe you makes you sound positively ancient. :D
Tozer - Cumbria, Weston-super-Mare
Frape - Bristol, Frampton on Severn
Phillips - Bristol/Bath
Eardley - Wooden Box, Workington
Lightfoot - Workington
Cowx - Cumbria
Jay - Bristol
Ford - Bath/Bristol
Marshman - Bristol
Thomas - Cornwall
Spratt - Bristol
Peters - West Indies, Bristol, UK (circus family)
Paisey - Bath
Nicholas - Sennen