Hello Suey,
I had a look at that and agree with you that it's hard to read, but under magnification it's definitely William Joyner, not William James, and it's Spackman, not Spachman. Thomas's age is wrong too, 16 when he should be 18, and with the lack of a birthplace Mr. Joyner doesn't seem to know his servant very well.
Which makes me wonder if Thomas was not merely sleeping there and working next door at the New Inn. This sounds much more likely than him working in a bakery, as he'd spent all his life in a pub and would have known that trade well.
Anyway, in spite of the wrong age and the lack of a birthplace it must be a strong possibility, but the best result I've had so far. Many thanks for your interest.
Regards, Alastairgm