Hi Sue
This one’s going to run on and on I fear.

My friend located Old Ordnance Survey Maps: Gorton & Belle Vue 1905 (edition of 1908) which has extracts from Slaters Directory Manchester & Salford, 1905 printed on the back. This should reveal the positions of both 190 Hyde Rd, West Gorton and 190 Hyde Rd, Gorton.

190/192 West Gorton is a double fronted shop located on the corner of Hyde Road/Ashmore St, so clearly that’s out. For the record it is Joseph Motterhead, Baker in the directory. My friend also has a street directory for just West Gorton which shows it was still a bakers in 1965 then numbered 390/92 and owned by Edmonds Bakeries Ltd.
The link to Manchester Library I posted earlier shows Mead T Seymour & Co Ltd clearly on the corner of Oakfield Grove and Hyde Road. (Worth opening this now in another window)
http://www.images.manchester.gov.uk/web/pages/common/imagedisplay.php?&irn=30101&reftable=ecatalogue&refirn=36845&size=600x452 The directory lists this as 172 and as Grocers. In theory 190 should be 10 house down to the left. So far so good, then its all downhill.

The directory reads
Here is Oakfield grove
172 Mead T. Seymour & Co Ltd, grocers
778 Gorton Central Liberal Club
778 Smellie, William caretaker (how unfortunate is that)
786 Bowker, Joseph confectioner
Here is Hall Street
788 Broadbent, Harold, plumber
Here is Church view
Brookfield Unitarian Church
822 Egerton, William, chapel keeper
824 Leah, Arthur , Thos, wheelwright.
826 Wagon & Horses PH
Clearly the library picture shows Seymours on the right and the Wagon & Horses way down to the left past Brookfield Church. The order of side streets is correct and the houses in the picture reflect the layout of the map. However there are 7 buildings in the ‘Seymour’ block and about 16 in the next block. The numbers jump from 172 to 778 and there are less entries than properties. I’ve scanned the rest of the directory and there don’t appear to be any obvious gaps between numbers or leaps in numbering
You asked a perfectly straightforward question to which the answer should have been yes or no and we are now no nearer forward, with a deepening mystery. Can you look at your census info again, in case we have to go back to the Ardwick end.
Thanks
Tony