« Reply #72 on: Thursday 28 June 07 13:40 BST (UK) »
The point seems to be missing here in my humble opinion, if programme makers want to use your story and they get all the research you have done and they only have to confirm it why aren't they paying you? They get rvenue from the programme being aired and repeated.
I could be wrong but as far as I can see so far they haven't used much in the way of research done by the families. The family's storieshanded down through generations have been researched by the company makers. So the family get work done for them/ we enjoy (or not) the programme/ the TV get advertising revenue. Except in this case by the look of it they haven't had the viewing figures/advertising revenue to support it being on at a regular channel/time, or a second series? As far as I can see from the likes of Patrish, they aren't too interested if you have already done most of the work. The "good" telly is seeing the link that the family suspect/believe being proved or it seems most cases shattered.
Grothenwell
Aberdeenshire; Brechin, Robb, Clark, Hardie, Johnston, Watt, Elmslie, Milne, Harper, Adam, Edmond, Laing, Gibson, Aedie, Jameson, Argo & Doverty.
Booth, Watson, Grothenwell, Ewen, Mackie, Simpson, Piper, Taylor, Davidson, Willox, Chalmers & Gordon
Still, Fraser, Robertson, Burnet & Lumsden
Banffshire; Cruickshank, Bennet, Broug, Allen, West & Lyal
Caithness; Sutherland
Herefordshire, Worcester, Monmouthshire, Gloucestershire; Wagstaff, Jones, Turner, Wiggett, Hannes