« Reply #9 on: Saturday 16 April 11 19:17 BST (UK) »
Thanks john-p.......this could well be the family. Just the 1871 Census has me puzzled as I have Elizabeth not getting married to James Prutton until 26 Dec 1874. If she had been married prior to Prutton would she still be married by her maiden name?
Also if Sarah were an inhouse servant I am assuming that was why she does not show with her family and shows with the household she is serving instead? Was it common for older women to live away from their families for employment? I think I need to check into commonalities of lifestyles of that period.
Thanks again...MJ
Dalkeith, SCT: Lees, Waldie
Kirkcaldy, SCT: Cook, Easton
Edinburgh, SCT: Lees, Waldie, Hunter, Allan, Easton
St Cuthbert, SCT: Lees, Waldie
Dundee, SCT: Allan, Lees, Easton, Boyd
Kilsyth, SCT: Boyd
Buittle, SCT: Easton
Glasgow, SCT: Easton
Ontario, CANADA: Oliver
Saskatchewan, CANADA: Easton, Gee, Oliver, Prutton
Hertfordshire, ENG: Prutton
