Please help trace this person.

[yellowfurbaby]

Looks like the Ann we found in 1881 is not your lass ...

Marriages Mar 1881 
 
HAYWOOD  William    Mt.Bosworth Vol 7a Page 107   
WHETTON  Mary     do do do

Do you think that the name Ann was a mistake? They have made a mistake with name on the earlier census haven't they with Jane Ellen?

[Necromancer]

I'd go with it - subject to belt-and-braces with Marriage Cert - and one of the kids certs to check maiden name if you really really want to be sure ....

[Tati]

Here they are in 1881:
http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=uki1881&indiv=try&h=12220525

[Necromancer]

re Ann vs Mary on 1881 - who knows ! I've seen the strangest things on a return. The enumerator may have misunderstood, may have copied his schedule incorrectly into the formal return (the image you see on Ancestry) and and and ...  

We dont know the actual date of the marriage 1Q 1881 - I'm just assuming it had to be before the census (Census was taken on the night of 3 April 1881) .... and people do get enumerated in 2 places at once very occasionally ...

All the other points about missing daughters from 91 to 01 can probably be explained ...

[Necromancer]

Well spotted Tati .... now who is Ann with George Whetton in 1881 then   

[Tati]

Errr ... je ne sais pas 

[Necromancer]

Doh - she's on the 1871 - a year older than Mary  ..... never noticed as we didnt transcribe that entry  ... 

[Tati]

Snap, Newfy 

[Necromancer]

Liz - the other 'mystery' - you mentioned 2 Jane Ellens on the 1871.

The 2nd one is an UNNAMED son I'd say - it isnt a 'ditto' under Jane Ellen, just a line  

And in 1881 a 10 year old George C would seem to confirm it ....