To all concerned with defining what or how the Bighouse was used, looking at the census record for 1851 and 1861, Janet Watson is listed in both as a resident with either two or three children (depending on the year).
Other information gained by comparing the two census and all the individuals on them produces interesting information.
Take the 1951 census as an example. All the head of household listed on the same page as Janet Watson are female. Second, all the head of household are listed as "Pauper". It is also noted that all aduts (save John Collins) are listed as "Pauper". (Poor John is listed as a "Professor of Laziness") Although the son "Daniel MCCann" is listed as "Pauper (formerly Coal Miner).
It is also noted that each of the family groups listed on the census has a seperate residence disignation (column one) indicating that they did not live communally; but in individual family groups.
I have seen the post by others saying that this was not a poor house or similiar institution. Howver, I feel after reviewing the total record of these census records it is clear that the Bighouse was a form of poor house or perhaps the equilivant of the Americian "Poor Farm". A place where the poor (Pauper) could live with some assistance from the government.
For marge, I have a lot of information on the children of David and Sarah Alexander. You may commicate directly with me if you wish. I can either provide a gedcom or mail you a copy by CD.
For Danni, I am glad to see that you are still working on this line. If you feel you do not have all the material I have collected, please let me know and I will try to catch you up. In particular, I wrote an update to the family history last month or so and should have sent you a copy. You have my email.
Take care each of you - Ray Smith
