Hi Sparrett, Jamjar & majm "JM",
Thanks for your replies. Based on your advice I'll stick with Hobart as being the most likely resting place.
In reply to Jamjar's thoughts on preservation of a body, when Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte passed away in 1821 on the island of St. Helena then later exhumed in 1840 for reburial in Paris it was believed the high level of arsenic in his body attributed to his body's slow decay as the substance is toxic to microorganisms and slows down the decomposition of human tissue. So, yes, it is quite possible that some form of preservation may have taken place.
Now this is where the confusing part is, viz:
According to the undertaker's record, Elizabeth passed away at Hobart on 26th December 1851 from a stroke injury (apoplexy). Her residence ,'Cottage Green', was up for sale earlier that year on January 1851 via the Hobart "Colonial Times" as a consequence of Dr Richardson's immediate departure from the colony. Furthermore, the "Launceston Examiner" of 26th February 1851 mentions Dr Richardson as having left the colony. A Sydney newspaper, the "Empire" of 17th March 1851 mentions a Dr Richardson as being a passenger on the ship 'Blackwell' headed for London. Then the following year (10 months after Elizabeth's death) "The Shipping Gazette & Sydney General Trade List" of 9th October 1852 mentions the brig 'Emma' arrived from Hobart on 2nd October 1852 with a Dr Richardson, and the Sydney newspaper "Empire" of 18th November 1852 mentions the brig 'Golden Spring' on departure for Melbourne with a Dr Richardson. One year on from Elizabeth's death, a Hobart newspaper "The Courier" of 22 Dec 1852 advertises 'Cottage Green' as still being for sale, and as "the residence of Dr Richardson who is about to leave the colony." again.
So, yes, ships did sale up and down the east coast of Australia.
And, thank you Jamjar for the information on the grave sites.
regards
Ron