Author Topic: Uneasy about online tree  (Read 10694 times)

Offline Chorlton

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 223
  • Proudly born in Hyde
    • View Profile
Re: Uneasy about online tree
« Reply #54 on: Saturday 23 December 06 06:16 GMT (UK) »
I have a couple of questions about the online options:

ancestry.com  
I looked at mine on there and it states:
"my tree name"   (PUBLIC)
Not shared - (Share this tree with others)

This appears to say that others cannot see it.  Am I correct in thinking that ?


GenesReunited.com
Mine has the option set to NOT allow individuals born in the last 120yrs, with no death date, to be shown.

I assume that this also stops others, that may be able to assist me, in seeing relevant links.
Chorlton -  Ashton Under Lyne, Cheshire/Lancashire
Common - Halifax, Yorkshire & Scotland <a href="http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php/topic,198195.0.htmll">Common One Name Interests</a>
Clegg - Yorkshire
Barber - Ashton Under Lyne, Cheshire/Lancashire
Hadfield - Ashton Under Lyne, Cheshire/Lancashire
Whitley - Yorkshire

Any census information that I have included is Crown Copyright, as per: www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/legal/copyright.htm

Offline ymfoster

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,529
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Uneasy about online tree
« Reply #55 on: Saturday 23 December 06 11:06 GMT (UK) »
I am pleased to swap my research with distant rellies etc. but now state that no living people be put on the Net, ...... I naively also put my files on 'Gencircles' years back to find they were copied & claimed as that person's work, I mainly put them there to help other rellies & make contact, but withdrew them when they were talking of charging to look up information on other trees.
I've also noticed Ancestry seems to glean the information from these sites & some rellies don't like the LDS's practices, so it all becomes very complicated.

I only have my own ancestors on the Net now, I feel it's safer & easier to handle.

Cheers, Yvonne 
Restorers may use my restores to colour, acknowledgement appreciated.

Mostly England - <br />Walne Nfk - Argent Barritt Hammond Sfk - Asprey Comber Cribb Gundrey Higgs Plaw Sewell Sumption Sry - Baldwin Bull Nth -  Brumfield Dufty London Wor -  Calverley Greenhalgh Lan - Dodson Stainsby NRY - Denison WRY - Whittle Yks - Dormer Mdx - Felmingham Eng - Grecian Nbl -  Hayse Mass US - Jenner Ounstead Weeding Ssx - McDonald Skye - Campbell McIndoe McMillan Inv - Window Gls

Offline MarkyP

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 544
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Uneasy about online tree
« Reply #56 on: Saturday 23 December 06 13:51 GMT (UK) »
I have a couple of questions about the online options:

ancestry.com  
I looked at mine on there and it states:
"my tree name"   (PUBLIC)
Not shared - (Share this tree with others)

This appears to say that others cannot see it.  Am I correct in thinking that ?


GenesReunited.com
Mine has the option set to NOT allow individuals born in the last 120yrs, with no death date, to be shown.

I assume that this also stops others, that may be able to assist me, in seeing relevant links.


Chorlton, not sure about GenesReunited, but with Ancestry you've got yours on view to other ancestry members (public view) and haven't invited anyone to share it. Basically when you submit a tree you can invite people through Ancestry to view it, this is what the share part is! When it's personal, people have to contact you through Ancestry to be able to see it. Well that's how it's supposed to work!  :-\
Jerome - Hampshire (including IOW)
Parsons - Surrey, Somerset and Devon

Offline Ecneps

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 13,604
  • Rosalie Mathilda Jönsson 1916-1999
    • View Profile
Re: Uneasy about online tree
« Reply #57 on: Saturday 23 December 06 14:06 GMT (UK) »
I think there used to be the problem on ancestry that the USA cut-off date is 1930 for living individuals - not sure if that still applies..... ???
My neighbour was quite disconcerted to find herself and husband listed on someone's tree with (incorrect as it happens) birthdates.  I tried to email the tree owner to take them off but the email address must have been an old one and I had no reply, but I added a post-em note to the site to say they should be removed........
`There are two lasting bequests we can give our children -  One is roots - the other is wings`- Hodding Carter

Census and bmd information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

Lincs & Yorks - SIVILLS PREDGEN    Norfolk - EBBS WHITEROD ZIPFELL       Sweden - JÖNSSON CRONBERG ANDERSSON      Yorks - SPENCE HIDE HIRD      Durham - DALKIN SELBY RENWICK


Offline stephen7

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 714
    • View Profile
Re: Uneasy about online tree
« Reply #58 on: Saturday 23 December 06 16:24 GMT (UK) »
just my view, but i think permission should be asked beofre any info is used.i have uploaded my tree to my own site, but because of privacy reasons of living members, you have to log on before viewing the tree.( the rest of the  site is public viewing) only people i give a password to can log on, therefore they are all "vetted " before i allow it. i think this helps keep everyone involved happy
steve
watson,smith,(cambridge)cadle,(gloucester)hutton,utton, phenix,(norfolk)tarleton,paterson,sommerville,stephenson ( lanarkshire) ,walker, lewis, mordecai,sparks,(glamorgan),bolitho. (cornwall)

Offline Helina

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,057
  • Willow
    • View Profile
Re: Uneasy about online tree
« Reply #59 on: Saturday 23 December 06 16:39 GMT (UK) »
I can highly recomend Tribalpages for this, stephen,  to have access to my tree I need 2 passwords, and only I can decide if I want it open to the public etc.

helina
Austin,Bistol
Coole,Bristol
Lewis, Bristol
Williams,Olveston
Howard,Bristol
Shepherd Admonsbury.
Tinney, Plymouth.
Ogborn,Bristol.
Blore.Derbyshire,Bristol,Redditch.
Richards,Bristol
Milson, Bitton
Harrison, Derbyshire
Census information Crown Copyright  from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline suttontrust

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,850
    • View Profile
Re: Uneasy about online tree
« Reply #60 on: Sunday 24 December 06 08:36 GMT (UK) »
Downside asks what I would have said if my cousin's husband had asked my permission to put the tree on Ancestry.  I would have said yes, but if and when someone contacts you about the line that is actually mine, put them in touch with me.
I've shared lots of info on GR.  It worries me that a person who got all or some of their info from me then becomes the contact, the expert in that line, and I'm cut out of the picture.
Godden in East Sussex, mainly Hastings area.
Richards in Lea, Gloucestershire, then London.
Williamson in Leith, Vickers in Nottingham.
Webb in Bildeston and Colchester.
Wesbroom in Kirby le Soken.
Ellington in Harwich.
Park, Palmer, Segar and Peartree in Kersey.

Offline kerryb

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,927
    • View Profile
Re: Uneasy about online tree
« Reply #61 on: Sunday 24 December 06 08:42 GMT (UK) »
I titally agree with you suttontrust and that is why if there was more of an onus on sites such as GR to acknowledge sources and be honest about where the research came from there would be less chance of us getting cut out of the picture.

But I guess GR and sites such as that couldn't care less where the trees come from or how correct they are  :( :(

Kerry
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Searching for my family - Baldwin - Sussex, Middlesex, Cork, Pilbeam - Sussex, Harmer - Sussex, Terry - Surrey, Kent, Rhoades - Lincs, Roffey - Surrey, Traies - Devon & Middlesex & many many more to be found on my website ....

Offline Helina

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,057
  • Willow
    • View Profile
Re: Uneasy about online tree
« Reply #62 on: Sunday 24 December 06 15:18 GMT (UK) »
Yes I totally agree, kerryb, only to day I observed a list of surnames that I have researched, on genes, but what can you do about it. You give information and hope its used senseably.  But it is annoying.
helina

Austin,Bistol
Coole,Bristol
Lewis, Bristol
Williams,Olveston
Howard,Bristol
Shepherd Admonsbury.
Tinney, Plymouth.
Ogborn,Bristol.
Blore.Derbyshire,Bristol,Redditch.
Richards,Bristol
Milson, Bitton
Harrison, Derbyshire
Census information Crown Copyright  from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk