Author Topic: Reason for marriage  (Read 5010 times)

Offline kerryb

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,926
    • View Profile
Re: Reason for marriage
« Reply #36 on: Monday 13 November 06 17:39 GMT (UK) »
LOL Deegee

I think my partner might agree with that ::) ::) ::) ::) :o :o :o :o

He has to drag me off each evening.  He'll be home soon perhaps I'd better think about dinner.

Kerry  ;D ;D ;D
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Searching for my family - Baldwin - Sussex, Middlesex, Cork, Pilbeam - Sussex, Harmer - Sussex, Terry - Surrey, Kent, Rhoades - Lincs, Roffey - Surrey, Traies - Devon & Middlesex & many many more to be found on my website ....

Offline patrish

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,816
  • Winter Wonderland
    • View Profile
Re: Reason for marriage
« Reply #37 on: Monday 13 November 06 17:59 GMT (UK) »
I have cheated, sent out for fish and chips, so more time on here. and no clearing up. ;D ;D ;D

Patrish.
this information is Crown Copyright. from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk   London Hall, Thurston Stanley, Phillips, Ayrton, White, Morrish, Smith.    West Ham/Barking Saint,Briggs,   Essex  Barker,   Hampshire  Kill, Kent Spong,   U.S.A Earp, Scotland/Cumbria Templeton, Devon Morrish, Chudley

Offline suey

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,843
  • The light is on but there's no-one at home!
    • View Profile
Re: Reason for marriage
« Reply #38 on: Monday 13 November 06 18:01 GMT (UK) »
Quote
Was he already married or was there some reason her parents didn't approve of him or something??

How intriguing!!

It's all very odd ???,  William legitimised all the children in his will calling them his 'natural children' .  

There is no sign of him having a wife elsewhere

Hannahs father also left a will and named the nine children born up to that date as 'my grandchildren' - so no problem there either.
Having said that Hannah's father was nearly as bad, he left the bulk of his small estate to his own b****** son  :o

Gawd, what a family ::) however it does make things interesting :D

Suey
All census lookups are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Sussex - Knapp. Nailard. Potten. Coleman. Pomfrey. Carter. Picknell
Greenwich/Woolwich. - Clowting. Davis. Kitts. Ferguson. Lowther. Carvalho. Pressman. Redknap. Argent.
Hertfordshire - Sturgeon. Bird. Rule. Claxton. Taylor. Braggins

Offline kerryb

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,926
    • View Profile
Re: Reason for marriage
« Reply #39 on: Monday 13 November 06 18:08 GMT (UK) »
Sounds a bit like my great great grandmother's family. 

Helena Lorraine Lovekin Stanford Smith, so far I've not found a marriage for her parents and everytime I order what I think is a birth certificate for one of the nine children, the father's name that comes back is an unknown man, usually with the surname Lovekin, so far helena's siblings have a William Lovekin as father, a Henry Lovekins and a John Lovekin. ::) ::)

The father on the census records is John Smith or is it????

Oh and Helena's birth certificate, well so far after ordering 3 I think I have narrowed it down to one particular one that calls her Helena Rawlins with father William Rawlins.  The only linking factor on all these is the mother Emily Stanford. ??? ???

Oh and in 1871 there appears to be two almost identical census records for the family. :o :o

I am now beginning to think they just liked a joke!!!!! ;D ;D

Kerry
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Searching for my family - Baldwin - Sussex, Middlesex, Cork, Pilbeam - Sussex, Harmer - Sussex, Terry - Surrey, Kent, Rhoades - Lincs, Roffey - Surrey, Traies - Devon & Middlesex & many many more to be found on my website ....


Offline suey

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,843
  • The light is on but there's no-one at home!
    • View Profile
Re: Reason for marriage
« Reply #40 on: Monday 13 November 06 19:09 GMT (UK) »

Lol Kerry,
Quote
Helena Lorraine Lovekin Stanford Smith
what a great name :D You have my commiserations :'(  Have you ever found a Mr Lovekin?

- at least my lot were truthfull if at times a little confused as to which surname they should be using, all the surviving children, bar one, eventually made it to the alter, baptised and registered their children and told the truth at census time, so something to be grateful for  ;D

Methinks there's something in the Sussex air, don't you ;D ;D
All census lookups are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Sussex - Knapp. Nailard. Potten. Coleman. Pomfrey. Carter. Picknell
Greenwich/Woolwich. - Clowting. Davis. Kitts. Ferguson. Lowther. Carvalho. Pressman. Redknap. Argent.
Hertfordshire - Sturgeon. Bird. Rule. Claxton. Taylor. Braggins

Offline kerryb

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,926
    • View Profile
Re: Reason for marriage
« Reply #41 on: Monday 13 November 06 19:33 GMT (UK) »
Methinks there's something in the Sussex air, don't you ;D ;D

Methinks you could be right ;D ;D ;D ;D

Kerry
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Searching for my family - Baldwin - Sussex, Middlesex, Cork, Pilbeam - Sussex, Harmer - Sussex, Terry - Surrey, Kent, Rhoades - Lincs, Roffey - Surrey, Traies - Devon & Middlesex & many many more to be found on my website ....

Offline julianb

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,529
  • Portrait of the genealogist as a young man
    • View Profile
Re: Reason for marriage
« Reply #42 on: Monday 13 November 06 20:00 GMT (UK) »
All this makes my family's "indiscretions" quite mild.  There had been some doubt about my father's grandparents  getting married (I don't think they did), and my mother said quite emphatically "But there's nothing wrong with my family". 

Well, up to a point, Lord Copper   ;D ;D

A few years ago when I started doing my research, she passed over some information a cousin of hers had gathered.  She quietly, discreetly, and perhaps sheepishly, pointed out that her grandparents had produced their first child before they were married.

Otherwise, given the evidence on the rest of this thread, I am just a little disappointeed that I have only one orphan, one illegitimate, and one set of married first cousins to show (so far).

JULIAN
ESSEX  Carter, Enever, Jeffrey, Mason, Middleditch, Pond, Poole, Rose, Sorrell, Staines, Stephens, Surry, Theobald HUNTS  Danns KENT  Luetchford, Wood NOTTINGHAMSHIRE  Baker, Dunks, Kemp, Price, Priestley, Swain, Woodward SUFFOLK  Rose SURREY  Bedel, Bransden, Bysh, Coleman, Gibbs, Quinton SUSSEX Gibbs, Langridge, Pilbeam, Spencer WILTSHIRE  Brice, Rumble
Baker-Carter Family History

Offline trish251

  • RootsChat Leaver
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *
  • Posts: 9,156
    • View Profile
Re: Reason for marriage
« Reply #43 on: Tuesday 14 November 06 08:24 GMT (UK) »
Many thanks to everyone for the most interesting replies. I was initially thinking of all the "late" marriages in my families but comments have moved on to "no marriages" (and I have a couple of them) and even cousins. A couple of my family branches were very into cousins marrying cousins - I often think it was perhaps a good idea that some of them moved to Australia & found some new genes to mix with  ;D  ;D

Suey's family were perhaps the frontrunners of what seems very common today - legal marriage is not a necessity for a good relationship. I was discussing with a friend today that divorce was so much more expensive than marriage - perhaps removing both from the list of events could be a very good idea.

Trish
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline patrish

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,816
  • Winter Wonderland
    • View Profile
Re: Reason for marriage
« Reply #44 on: Tuesday 14 November 06 10:52 GMT (UK) »
Divorce is as expensive as you make it.  My ex and I mutually agreed on everything and remained good friends thoughout and still are 12 years later, its cost us hardly anything.  I know this is not always possible but the only winners in divorce are the lawyers.
this information is Crown Copyright. from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk   London Hall, Thurston Stanley, Phillips, Ayrton, White, Morrish, Smith.    West Ham/Barking Saint,Briggs,   Essex  Barker,   Hampshire  Kill, Kent Spong,   U.S.A Earp, Scotland/Cumbria Templeton, Devon Morrish, Chudley