Hi
If the deceased twin is registered as a Smith, is it reasonable to assume that the surviving twin was known as Thomas Smith which is how he appears on the 1891 census?
On the 1861 census, there are four Thomas Smiths born 1856 +/-5 in the Edmonton district. Three of those do not have a mother called Eliza and are born 1852, 1853 or 1860.. The fourth one, born 1857, is living with his grandparents:
1861 RG9/799/63/2
High Road, Enfield, Middlesex (Edmonton Registration Dist.)
Thomas Smith, head, 58, Ag Lab, b. Berkshire
Maria Smith, wife, 60, b. Essex
William Smith, grandson, 10, scholar, b. Enfield, Middlesex
Thomas Smith, grandson, 4, scholar, b. Enfield
Amelia Smith, grand dau, 2, b. Enfield
1851 HO107/1703/480/30
Turkey St, Enfield, MiddlesexThomas Smith, head, 46, labourer, b. Ashbury, Berkshire
Maria Smith, wife, 50, b. Roydon, Essex
George Smith, son in law, mar, 28, labourer, b. Enfield, Middlesex
Sarah Smith, dau, mar, 22, b. Ashbury, Berkshire
Eliza Smith, dau, unmar, 15, b. Enfield
Maria Smith, dau, 13, b. Enfield
William Smith, son, 11, b. Enfield
Authen? Smith, son, 3, b. Enfield
Jerne? Smith, gran dau, 1 mth, b. Enfield
Of course, all this can only be regarded as the
faintest possibility!!!
Cheers
Koromo
