OK then, Tricia.
Ignore the 'death' bit as I was only p***ing in the dark with that one, because BMD don't specify whether it's a married name or not with the death cases, do they?
Here's the death I was thinking of though ...
Jane Pashby Mar quarter 1903 Scarborough aged 81 Vol 9d page 233The age is correct, but as I said, it's not clear whether she is a spinster or is married.
As she was BORN Jane Pashby, it is unlikely that the 'married' one that you mention in 1881, 1891, 1901 would be her, yes?
It seems that a lot of my ancestors spent a lot of time boarding or lodging with siblings, so it's sensible to presume that she might be lodging with another family member - but I haven't found out yet.
I have no indication that she has married after 1871, as she will be at least 48 by then, but I suppose that she could have done!
Roger
