Author Topic: 18th century naming patterns  (Read 4559 times)

Offline Jim Murray

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 196
    • View Profile
18th century naming patterns
« on: Wednesday 22 March 06 19:57 GMT (UK) »
Can anyone tell me how far parents followed any scheme in naming their successive offspring such as taking their own parents' and grandparents' names in turn?

Thank you.

Jim Murray

Offline Forfarian

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 15,936
  • http://www.rootschat.com/links/01ruz/
    • View Profile
Re: 18th century naming patterns
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday 29 March 06 18:06 BST (UK) »
The tradition was

first daughter after mother's mother
second daughter after father's mother
third daughter after mother

first son after father's father
second so after mother's father
third son after father

but it wasn't followed 100%. It can be useful to help sort families out - for example I had two Grizel Leslies born in the same parish in the same year, one the daughter of a William and the other the daughter of a Joseph. Both married and had several sons - one had a William and no Joseph, the other a Joseph and no William - so no problem working out which was which.

But the pattern can be disrupted by all sorts of things, so it is only a guide, not a hard and fast rule.
Never trust anything you find online (especially submitted trees and transcriptions on Ancestry, MyHeritage, FindMyPast and other commercial web sites) unless it's an image of an original document - and even then be wary because errors can and do occur.

Offline Jim Murray

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 196
    • View Profile
Re: 18th century naming patterns
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday 29 March 06 18:56 BST (UK) »
Thanks very much, Forfarian

I'm away to test it out.

Jim Murray

Offline 428290

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 19
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 18th century naming patterns
« Reply #3 on: Friday 13 August 10 22:29 BST (UK) »
Do not lose sight that they may have called multiple children by the same name as mortality was high and there was an expectation that one child would die.
there would be a slight variation on the name, William, Willie, Wills
Evy


Offline Forfarian

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 15,936
  • http://www.rootschat.com/links/01ruz/
    • View Profile
Re: 18th century naming patterns
« Reply #4 on: Friday 13 August 10 23:12 BST (UK) »
There was probably a variation in the version of the name used informally within the family, but the official/baptismal/formal name for all these variants (and Bill, Billy etc) would have been William.
Never trust anything you find online (especially submitted trees and transcriptions on Ancestry, MyHeritage, FindMyPast and other commercial web sites) unless it's an image of an original document - and even then be wary because errors can and do occur.

Offline 428290

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 19
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 18th century naming patterns
« Reply #5 on: Sunday 15 August 10 15:36 BST (UK) »
You are quite right but it did throw me off a little while thinking that there was an error in dates.  What i have been trying to chase is the m.s. is this maiden name or married name in the census returns.  I have someone who is born a BERTIE but says m.s. Wilson.  Confusing to say the least.
Many thanks for the reply and update.
Evelyn Bertie

Offline Maggie1895

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,070
    • View Profile
Re: 18th century naming patterns
« Reply #6 on: Sunday 15 August 10 15:45 BST (UK) »
Check out the possibility of more than one marriage.   I don't know where you are looking, but in the poorer communities, say Ag Labs and Miners, death was common and the surviving partner could marry again very quickly as combining households was often the only way to pay the rent and look after the children.

That often led to multiple surnames for women, who might marry listing their previous married name but record their MS as well, or sometimes instead.   My own gr.gr.grandmother married in 1846 so both names were clear, showed MS on 2 children's births, was widowed in 1850 and then gave her MS on the 1851 census, though her children had their father's surname.    When she married again she used her married name, and all 3 names ended up on her death certificate.   

You're right - it is confusing!
Census information Crown Copywright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk / National Archives of Scotland

Offline 428290

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 19
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 18th century naming patterns
« Reply #7 on: Sunday 15 August 10 16:09 BST (UK) »
You are a star and what a quick response.

Will print it out and check through it.

Many thanks, Evelyn

Offline Maggie1895

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,070
    • View Profile
Re: 18th century naming patterns
« Reply #8 on: Sunday 15 August 10 16:35 BST (UK) »
Evelyn, why don't you post what information you have and see if anyone can help?    Names, dates, sources etc
Census information Crown Copywright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk / National Archives of Scotland