Author Topic: Help Finding Walter Byron  (Read 9733 times)

Offline UKgirl

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 333
    • View Profile
Re: Help Finding Walter Byron
« Reply #18 on: Tuesday 21 February 06 14:00 GMT (UK) »
Just to upset you, there is another Walter Hickman "grandson" born in the Dudley Union workhouse!

With your theory, both may be possibilities!! This one is 7 years old!!

1881 Civil Parish Sedgley

Head: William Hickman Mar 58
Wife: Kyiah Hickman 58
son of wife: Samuel Thomas 23
last Hickman's grandson: Walter Hickman 7 born in Dudley Union
ditto                               : Benjamin Hickman 3 born in Dudley Union

Born in Dudley Union would suggest a single mother and may explain a change of name in later life.

The writing is unusual and the "H" looks like a "D", but all the H's on the page eg Henry/ Harriet look the same.

UKgirl
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Andy001

  • my email address is not working
  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 389
    • View Profile
Re: Help Finding Walter Byron
« Reply #19 on: Tuesday 21 February 06 14:34 GMT (UK) »
Hello Again,It certainly has been a really difficult one and I wouldn't have been able to do it without loads of help!THANKS ;D

I don't think I'll ever know for sure,but since I'm now not the only one to match Francis Charles with Walter I think this is the closest I'll get.It was just a bit of a mad theory,but to find a Walter with the same family twice,both the right age,is too coincidental to overlook.
I didn't come up with the idea Walter might have been a Hickman,I was just looking for Martha's mum in 1881 and couldn't believe there was a Walter with her!!!

Walter's dad could be FC's dad George/Charles or it could be Thomas Adams before him and Patti/Martha married (I've never found a marriage!!)


I think I'll send off for Walter Hickman's birth cert,see what that says,though I wouldn't be surprised if his mum was one of Martha's sisters,just to complicate it further!!!

Whatever Walter's real name was,I bet he changed it to avoid the bizzies,he tried to kill his wife with an axe and ran off and left her for dead!!!
Andy
West Midlands;Manchester;Halifax;Wadsworth;<br />Denholme;Aberdeen;Leeds;Oxford;Ludgershall;Bletchingdon<br /><br />Watson,Pollitt,Briggs,Purcell,Byron,Clancy,McNulty,Hartley,Spencer,Whyte,Worth,Mills,Cripps,Howson,Wright

Online heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 42,426
    • View Profile
Re: Help Finding Walter Byron
« Reply #20 on: Tuesday 21 February 06 15:27 GMT (UK) »
Hi Andrea,
Having now found Walter with granny Hickman and Pattie with George Bryan and Francis- I feel so much better!
Go for Walter's birth certificate- what the heck!
Heywood
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Andy001

  • my email address is not working
  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 389
    • View Profile
Re: Help Finding Walter Byron
« Reply #21 on: Tuesday 21 February 06 17:31 GMT (UK) »
Yeah,what the heck,I don't even care wether he's actually 'mine' or not any more-I just wanna solve this wierd puzzle!!!
Ta for your help :)
Andy
West Midlands;Manchester;Halifax;Wadsworth;<br />Denholme;Aberdeen;Leeds;Oxford;Ludgershall;Bletchingdon<br /><br />Watson,Pollitt,Briggs,Purcell,Byron,Clancy,McNulty,Hartley,Spencer,Whyte,Worth,Mills,Cripps,Howson,Wright


Offline UKgirl

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 333
    • View Profile
Re: Help Finding Walter Byron
« Reply #22 on: Wednesday 22 February 06 06:28 GMT (UK) »
THE MARRIAGES
Francis Charles' Birth certificate shows his mum as Patti (formerly Hickman),which I'm told is another name for Martha!!!
Thanks to people on here and GR I know where Patti was in 1851.1861 and 1871.
Though in 1871 she is Patti BRYAN-with a husband called George
FC Byrons birth+marriage certs list his dad as Charles!!!!
I think it may yet be solved if you could just find the marriages to knit it all together.
ANYWAY,back to Walter-I think Francis's mum 'married' Thomas Adams
although there are no records of it.In 1891 though,they are living in Stockport with a son called Walter-though his last name is Adams,he is the right age.
Francis was in Salford in 1901,The Adams's were nearby.
As it is, the story is difficult to grasp with just a quick glance at the above.
(Although genius Heywood seems to have managed!!)
I hoped to find Martha Hicmans marriage to a Byron but have found none.I can't find her marriage to Thomas Adams either to connect her,Francis and Walter.
Any suggestions anyone?
Martha Hickman-if she is Martha Byron/Bryan/Adams was born 1848/9
Why don't you clearly list the necessary marriages needed and the time frames, and then someone may come up with something.
I have the British Vital Records Index. There may (or unfortunately, probably won't!) be something there that matches. The good thing about it is that it brings up good alternative spellings.
.......................................................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................................................................
LITTLE WALTER
I think I've just found Walter!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I looked on ancestry for Martha Hickman's mum in 1881,and she was with one of her other daughters,who had a nephew called.........Walter Hickman age 6!!!
There is another Walter Hickman "grandson" born in the Dudley Union workhouse! This one is 7 years old!!
Born in Dudley Union would suggest a single mother and may explain a change of name in later life.

Since I found the other Walter Hickman born in Dudley Union, probably with no father's name, it may be difficult to know which is which when you send off for the certificate- or rather, after you receive the certificate ???

Or have I seriously lost the plot here?

And does the whole theory hinge on the assumption that the names "Pattie" and "Martha" are interchangeable?
Is that really true, or did someone else come up with that to make the pieces fit?

What about Pattie simply being short for Patience?
There is a Patience Hickman who married a William Hickman in 1874. :P
Can she be squeezed into the picture somewhere? At the very least it is evidence that the name "Patience" was used in the family.

Yes, I know, I should just probably just stay quiet :-X

Oh well.......... just trying to remove alternative theories to help you get the pieces in their correct place ;D

Looking forward to reading the plot in chronological order, so that we simpletons can grasp it ;)

UKgirl

PS. I have just checked the genealogy.about.com site and its discussion of nicknames.

Abbreviations for Martha: Marty; Matie; Mattie

Abbreviations for Martha & Matilda & Patricia & Patience: Pat; Patsy; Patty; Pattie

But as  you look down the list from A to Z, it is really so very rare for a nickname to share nothing with its longer version. In 99% of cases listed, either:
starting letter is the same
the first 1/2 of the name is somehow used
the second 1/2 of the name is somehow used
there is a common syllable to both

The exceptions, such as "Daisy for Margaret" (but that's not an exception if you think of the 2 flowers' names (daisy & marguerite)) or "Polly for Mary" are really the exceptions.

And although "Pattie for Martha" is on the list, in a story like this where nothing actually fits smoothly, and everything depends on this nickname, I think I would be very dubious.

Now, on the other hand, if everything else fitted except for the name, then I think that I would run with it.


   
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Andy001

  • my email address is not working
  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 389
    • View Profile
Re: Help Finding Walter Byron
« Reply #23 on: Wednesday 22 February 06 08:58 GMT (UK) »
Hi UKgirl !
Someone found Patti Bryan in 1871 for me,
the Againsts are:
                           the name is BRYAN instead of BYRON
                           the husband is George instead of Charles

the FORs are:Patti+name like Byron
                      Born in Dudley
                      son called Francis born in Birmingham in 1870
                      parents called Hickman
                      George's job was similar to Charles

ALSO when the same family were found in 1861 Patti was now called Martha UNLESS they were twins!!!!!!!!!!

I will do what you suggested and put the marriageson here that need to be found ( I'll list them now and may do a new post later)
   
Here are the time frames for the marriages:

Patti/Martha Hickman + Charles/George(will accept William!!!!) Bryan/Byron 
Martha was born 1848/9 and her son was born Jan 1870

Walter was born 1874-don't yet know father.

Martha was living with Thomas Allchurch Adams in 1881,there was a daughter,Blanche (might be just Thomas's) born 1878 Salford,the next child was Thomas born after the 1881 census-1882

I have done a lot of searching for these,but with all the name changes and ways to spell/misspell Byron (Biron,Byrom,Byrem,Byram,Bryan,Brian,Bryon etc etc) it's a nightmare!!!!

So,any help is VERY much appreciated!!

Andy



West Midlands;Manchester;Halifax;Wadsworth;<br />Denholme;Aberdeen;Leeds;Oxford;Ludgershall;Bletchingdon<br /><br />Watson,Pollitt,Briggs,Purcell,Byron,Clancy,McNulty,Hartley,Spencer,Whyte,Worth,Mills,Cripps,Howson,Wright

Online heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 42,426
    • View Profile
Re: Help Finding Walter Byron
« Reply #24 on: Wednesday 22 February 06 09:32 GMT (UK) »
Righto UKgirl - time to re-evaluate- I'm going to have one last go!! I'm bothered now because Thomas Allchurch Adams has been mentioned and thought that in the dim and distant past he had been discounted!! Need to jot and doodle here!
Heywood
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Online heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 42,426
    • View Profile
Re: Help Finding Walter Byron
« Reply #25 on: Wednesday 22 February 06 12:06 GMT (UK) »
Hi to you both-
I've spent HOURS searching and cannot come to any more conclusions than Walter Hickman is the best bet to go for. Mr and Mrs Hickman seemed to have several daughters so there is a possibility that Martha is not the mum but you have to eliminate her. There is also the chance that she took him in anyway! Can't find Thomas anywhere before 1901 and Francis has disappeared in 1901 as far as I can see but didn't search too much.
There are so many possibilities here with names/marriages/relationships that the sensible thing is to go for something -certificate which MIGHT tell the truth (mmm..).
Best of luck- it's been fun!
Kath
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline UKgirl

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 333
    • View Profile
Re: Help Finding Walter Byron
« Reply #26 on: Wednesday 22 February 06 15:35 GMT (UK) »
We need help with the image.

I've been taking a closer look at the 1881 Census in Salford, and I think it says something of relevance in that crossed out squiggly bit.

Could it say "Late sister's son"....or something like that. I am sure that there's one of those words that has been abbreviated with little letters added in a high place and then underlined, to the left of the word son.

~~~~~~~~--------------------------

And, I feel sure that Pattie & Martha are different people.

In 1871, George Bryan is listed as lodger crossed out to visitor.

But Pattie is listed as "wife" (of course this is incorrect, since the Census shows "relation to head of the family")

I guess it should say "wife of visitor".

I am sure that if she was Adam's daughter, it would simply say "daughter", and next to George it would say "son-in-law".

The Enumerator knew about the word "son-in-law" because he uses it lower down the page. Although that too is incorrectly followed by "wife".

The very fact that George has been corrected once from "lodger", not to "son-in-law" but to "visitor", makes me think that Pattie may be a niece, or more distant relative, rather than Adam's daughter.

Just more mud in already very muddy waters?

Hope not :)

UKgirl
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk