Author Topic: Samuel and Ann Lloyd of Wellington 1841  (Read 1861 times)

Offline Puffcat

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,357
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Samuel and Ann Lloyd of Wellington 1841
« on: Wednesday 21 December 05 22:39 GMT (UK) »
I am trying to trace the whereabouts of Samuel and Ann Lloyd in 1841

On the 1851 Census they are in Church Street Welington where Samuel was a shoemaker.

Samuel Lloyd 59 born Chetton
Ann Lloyd 55 born Clee
John Lloyd  17 born Welington
Lucy Lloyd 14
William Lloyd 10

Offline MikeWoolridge

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 317
    • View Profile
Re: Samuel and Ann Lloyd of Wellington 1841
« Reply #1 on: Thursday 22 December 05 12:14 GMT (UK) »
Found Samuel and Ann on 1841 census living at The Square, Wellington

Samuel 45 a cordwainer
Ann 40
Eliza 15
George 15
Samuel 12
John 8
Susannah 4
Louisa 3
William 8 mnths

all were born in county

Hope it helps

Mike
This information is Crown Copyright, from "http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk"

Woolridge, Wooldridge, Reece, Rees, Rushton, Frost, Gledhall, Turner, Meacham, Machin, Heath

Offline Puffcat

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,357
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Samuel and Ann Lloyd of Wellington 1841
« Reply #2 on: Thursday 22 December 05 13:08 GMT (UK) »
Thank you for that, better get a copy birth certificate from Shropshire to check Louisa/Lucy name, particularly as I cannot locate her marriage to George Robinson.


Offline tedstockton

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 10
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Samuel and Ann Lloyd of Wellington 1841
« Reply #3 on: Sunday 05 August 07 14:44 BST (UK) »
Samuel Lloyd and Ann are my 3rd great grandparents on my mothers side. I would be interested in sharing information with you about this family.

His son John was the father of Matilda my maternal great Grandmother.

I hope this helps.

Ted Stockton
Stockton, Manchester,Ireland
Batt , Hertfordshire
Fuller, Hertfordshire, London, UK
Hooper, Barnstaple
Cole, Poplar , Aldgate
Williams, wellington Shropshire
Marshall, Todmorden
Woodhead, Todmorden
Fairhurst manchester,Wigan,Southport


Offline Daisypetal

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,515
    • View Profile
Re: Samuel and Ann Lloyd of Wellington 1841
« Reply #4 on: Monday 06 August 07 11:32 BST (UK) »
Hi,

How about this marriage,

Lucy LLOYD  Jun Q 1867  Manchester  v.8d  p.384
George ROBINSON with same details.


Oops  :) just realised that this message is quite old so you probably have seen this already, but I've posted it just in case  :)

Daisy
All Census Data included in this post is Crown Copyright (see: www.nationalarchives.gov.uk)

Offline tedstockton

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 10
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Samuel and Ann Lloyd of Wellington 1841
« Reply #5 on: Monday 06 August 07 12:12 BST (UK) »
Thanks for that. Ebn has sent me quite alot of information which has added to my knowledge. I thought this Manchester marriage was odd at first but I then realised I had alreday found it myself and used it as a basis for Lucy lloyd marrying George Robinson.

Why  they would marry in Manchester is a mystery though as both were from Shropshire and continue to live and have children in Shropshire.

Perhaps Ebn can shed some light ?

Ted
Stockton, Manchester,Ireland
Batt , Hertfordshire
Fuller, Hertfordshire, London, UK
Hooper, Barnstaple
Cole, Poplar , Aldgate
Williams, wellington Shropshire
Marshall, Todmorden
Woodhead, Todmorden
Fairhurst manchester,Wigan,Southport

Offline Puffcat

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,357
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Samuel and Ann Lloyd of Wellington 1841
« Reply #6 on: Monday 06 August 07 12:34 BST (UK) »

It was a mystery to me too, and I left it to one side for a while thinking it was inaccurate. But it IS the only marriage to fit.

I think they had their first child before marriage and married afterwards, but why in Manchester I cannot think.