Author Topic: Some amazingly well researched trees  (Read 12540 times)

Offline allycat

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 734
  • The Cantwell Knights of Strongbow 1170
    • View Profile
Re: Some amazingly well researched trees
« Reply #27 on: Saturday 06 May 06 11:37 BST (UK) »
Hi Veron, I too have my tree on http://www.GenesReunited.com.au and as there doesn't seem to be the facility to 'cut living people out', what I do is just type in the year of birth of living people, and for their name I put e.g. "LIVING Smith".

I also caution everyone who contacts me when they let me see their tree - not to have full dates of birth on the living or when the living were married.  It would be all to easy for one unscrupulous person to use data on the living to another's disadvantage.  And I'm 100% positive that all these people with the groaningly huge family trees in cyberspace haven't asked permission of their living relatives which the sites highly recommend. ;)

At least in comparison to rootsweb where anybody can view your tree, on GenesReunited you can with the click of a button, reduce the sharing of your tree so it's not all bad.

Allycat.
Abrams, Amor, Attwood, Bancroft, Bragier, Brennan, Bryant, Buchan, Cantwell, Cruse, Commins, Cullum, Debus, Denner, Dinner, DuCroix, Flanze, Gilkes, Greaves, Guthiel, Hansford, Hayes, Hokaanga, Homewood, Hoy, Inns, Jahn, King, Knee, Marriner, May, McCarron, McCavel, McCrohon, McFarlane, Merry, Milne, Montgomery, Most, Mott, Orth, Parker, Pine, Roads, Rueping, Sear, Siegner, Stanaway, Voss, Weber, Wheeler, Whitehall, Woodcock

Offline kerryb

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,927
    • View Profile
Re: Some amazingly well researched trees
« Reply #28 on: Saturday 06 May 06 11:50 BST (UK) »
What a thread, really gave me a laugh!!

I have to admit when I started I found that a couple of strands on my family tree were well researched and I have used them.  However since then I am working my way through those strands and researching, double checking, correcting and adding to them.

I treated them as my foundation with which I am working.  I have been able to correct a couple of wrong bits and add some other bits to this extensive research.  On one name, I was able to add two strands together, for which one of the originators was very grateful. 

Anyway I am rambling again but basically what I am saying is that it's ok using research already done but everything should be checked and verified by yourself and I don't mind when people do that with my tree either!

Kerry  ;D
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Searching for my family - Baldwin - Sussex, Middlesex, Cork, Pilbeam - Sussex, Harmer - Sussex, Terry - Surrey, Kent, Rhoades - Lincs, Roffey - Surrey, Traies - Devon & Middlesex & many many more to be found on my website ....

Offline CarolBurns

  • I am no longer accepting new replies to my topics
  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,921
  • I'm still looking !
    • View Profile
Re: Some amazingly well researched trees
« Reply #29 on: Saturday 06 May 06 13:19 BST (UK) »
Carol,

Funny that you brought up my old post.  I have been in a nit of a rut with my tree. Just no new leads and seem to be spinning my wheels in place.  Nice to read and refresh myself on what I am doing with my tree. ;D

It's amazing how the "old" posts can make you start thinking in another direction or make you start relooking in the direction you thought was going nowhere

Carol
Thomas, Williams,Owen (s),Griffith (s), Jones - Anglesey<br />Burns, Wallace - Northumberland, Ireland, Scotland<br />Horsburgh, Sandilands, Blackhall, Rankine, Rankin, Hilson, Nielson - Scotland <br />Turnbull, Mills, Burgoyne, Burgon - Northumberland, <br />Davidson - Scotland, India, Burma<br /> Lopez - India, Burma<br/>

Offline skb

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 862
    • View Profile
Re: Some amazingly well researched trees
« Reply #30 on: Saturday 06 May 06 14:32 BST (UK) »
There is one particular website (I'm sure you know the one I mean) which allows you to add to family trees already on there. I discovered my ancestor's ancestors allegedly originated in England, then over several generations moved to Germany then to US then back to Lincolnshire, where they worked as Ag Labs.

Seems a bit unlikely to me ::)
Byers (Salford & London)
Stringfellow (Salford & Chorley)
Holmes (Manchester & Birmingham)
Goulding/Golden (Birmingham & Lincolnshire)
Bassett (Manchester & Salford, Staffordshire)
Child (Lincolnshire)
Belshaw (Salford)
Hallsworth (Eccles & Salford)
Vernon (Bury & Chapel en le Frith)

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline wheeldon

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,237
    • View Profile
Re: Some amazingly well researched trees
« Reply #31 on: Saturday 06 May 06 16:44 BST (UK) »
I agree with most of the comments on here.  However, I don't think people should be knocked for researching on the net, if they do it properly.  By this I mean using everything as a guide and through this ordering the relevant certs and using the census.  Unfortunately, this can only be done after 1837 but not everyone has the ability to visit the parish records. 
Wheeldon  Derbyshire & Manchester
Willshaw Staffordshire & Manchester
Wilshaw Staffordshire & Manchester
Pugh Manchester, Haston, Hadwell, Shrewsbury, Shropshire
Patrick Coventry, Warwick, Foleshill
Kelly Dronmore County Down & Manchester
Stewart  Hilsborough County Down & Manchester
Moffatt/Moffitt County May &, Lancashire

Offline kerryb

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,927
    • View Profile
Re: Some amazingly well researched trees
« Reply #32 on: Saturday 06 May 06 17:06 BST (UK) »
Not when they are hundreds of miles away or in a different country!!!

Or me, I just don't want to visit London, I hate it, I'm a country chick!!!

Kerry ;D
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Searching for my family - Baldwin - Sussex, Middlesex, Cork, Pilbeam - Sussex, Harmer - Sussex, Terry - Surrey, Kent, Rhoades - Lincs, Roffey - Surrey, Traies - Devon & Middlesex & many many more to be found on my website ....

Offline tulstig

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 660
  • me this year (2010) on El Camino do Santiago
    • View Profile
Re: Some amazingly well researched trees
« Reply #33 on: Saturday 06 May 06 17:43 BST (UK) »
Reading some of the comments on this thread I felt quite uncomfortable. Roostchat for me is a place to come to for help and some of the judgemental comments seem a tad unkind. (Did I hear someone say "If the cap fits" ? - or was that just my consciounce?)

Living in Spain a trip to the parish registers / record offices just isn't viable most of the time, however I do try to back up what I find on the net by cross referencing as much as possible and with certificates (which is a bit expensive) where I can. However there comes a point where no amount of checking can prove 100% that I have the right relative.

When people are kind enough to share their findings I am always grateful,and check as much as I can.

In many cases the information to break brick walls has come through other kind rootschatters, especially before I had found my feet in checking out stuff for myself. There has to be a level of trust otherwise sites like this simply wouldn't exist.

Whilst there may be some people who just want to find a royal family in their line, give the others a chance. We all do what we can,and is the OH us real genealogists' attitude any better? 

There are charletans in every walk of life, as well as those that are working their way through things.

Guess I'll get off my soapbox now,and hope I've not upset anyone nor been blackballed by anyone for disagreeing,

Cheers,

Mark
TULLETT (sussex),
LEE(Kent),
DALE(Sussex),
ANDREWS (who knows?),
LINDFIELD/LINFIELD(Sussex),
LANDER (Cornwall),
BLENCOWE (Sussex)
GROUT (Surrey)


All census information: Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline wheeldon

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,237
    • View Profile
Re: Some amazingly well researched trees
« Reply #34 on: Saturday 06 May 06 17:50 BST (UK) »
Mark, I do agree with you.  I think the net is a fantastic resource and I believe that you can make well reserached tree by using the net as long as you study the census material and buy the certs.  There are a masses of reasons why a person can't visit the parish records and even if you do visit and study them, you can still go down the completely wrong track.
Wheeldon  Derbyshire & Manchester
Willshaw Staffordshire & Manchester
Wilshaw Staffordshire & Manchester
Pugh Manchester, Haston, Hadwell, Shrewsbury, Shropshire
Patrick Coventry, Warwick, Foleshill
Kelly Dronmore County Down & Manchester
Stewart  Hilsborough County Down & Manchester
Moffatt/Moffitt County May &, Lancashire

Offline kerryb

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,927
    • View Profile
Re: Some amazingly well researched trees
« Reply #35 on: Saturday 06 May 06 18:00 BST (UK) »
And when Ancestry put all the parish registers online (ha ha) it will be even easier!!!!!!

Kerry (living in a dream world again!) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8)
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Searching for my family - Baldwin - Sussex, Middlesex, Cork, Pilbeam - Sussex, Harmer - Sussex, Terry - Surrey, Kent, Rhoades - Lincs, Roffey - Surrey, Traies - Devon & Middlesex & many many more to be found on my website ....