I'm new here. I'm researching our family tree and was puzzled by the Skelcher/Skelcey change too. There were plenty of Skelchers in Cubbington in the C18th but they seemed to have died out by the 1881 Census. OTOH the Skelseys (various spellings) proliferated. I found a lot of them at the Mormon site
http://www.familysearch.org/Eng/Search/frameset_search.asp. This is where I found William (Skelcher) Skelcey whose parents were Skelcher but whose children seemed to be all Skelcey.
My g-g-grandfather was a George Skelcey born in 1828, who married Ann Draper. I can't find any record of his birth, so I thought he might be a son of William. However, this seems unlikely if William had another son born in 1828 - there were other Skelceys George could have been a son of.
The only Skelceys (and Skelcys) listed in the 1901 Census were living within a few miles of Cubbington. Most of them were living at Regent Street - my g-grandparents James and Sarah and seven of their eleven children. Two of the others turn out to be their daughters (in service in Coventry and Leamington) leaving only the eldest daughters - one married, one dead by then. The rest seem not to be related, not even Elizabeth "on parish pay". James and Sarah have a great many descendants, though not all called Skelcey of course. I didn't investigate Skelseys then as there were many of them and I was told they were unrelated.
In the 1881 census all the SkelCeys on the Mormon site are unrelated to me - but in fact George and Ann SkelSey are living in Church Terrace with their youngest surviving children. James and Sarah SkelSey live nearby with their eldest children, while another adult son Thomas lodges on the same terrace. There is a tradition that my grandfather - eldest son George - was born on this terrace, before his parents moved to Regent Street.
The spelling seems very variable, however. James seems to have followed his father in using the S spelling in 1881, but Sarah seems to have registered all her children as SkelCY (I have the birth records of 8 of them). Of course literacy standards were lower then. By 1901 the whole James branch of the family seems to have settled on SkelcEY, and that has stuck.
What I found puzzling is that in 1881, 1891 and 1901 SkelSeys were found in a variety of counties (Middlesex, Yorkshire, Durham, Wiltshire etc) whilst the Skelcey and Skelcy variants were confined to central Warwickshire. You'd think that the spelling confusion could arise anywhere. Could it be that the other Skelseys pronounce their name Skelzey (compare Wolsey, Halsey, Ramsey etc) and the pronunciation changed in Cubbington and district because of the Skelsey/Skelcher merger? Any Skelseys around with the "z" sound?
I'd be interested to hear from anyone who thinks they may be descended from George and Ann's other children - the boys were called William, John, Thomas, George, Henry/Harry and Frederick, though Frederick seems to have been dead by 1881 - at least, not living in his parents' house - and only Thomas of the others has so far been found as an adult. There were two daughters but, again, the younger was not at home in 1881. If you are descended from the George who married Harriet Harrop and had a lot of children, he seems to have had a different father, so not closely related. But any info on Cubbington Skelceys would be welcome.
Thanks in advance,
Chris