Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Cherryexile

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 6
1
The Common Room / Re: tn17's Scavenger Hunt...Everyone Welcome To Join In
« on: Sunday 08 October 23 10:52 BST (UK)  »
Hey Neil
I have sent my email, not sure you have received
Elaine

Hello Elaine,

No I haven't but I have sent my e-mail address again in a Personal Messsage on here, so you can either reply to that with yours or try sending me an e-mail again.

Cheers.

Neil

2
The Common Room / Re: tn17's Scavenger Hunt...Everyone Welcome To Join In
« on: Monday 02 October 23 20:41 BST (UK)  »
I should also say that I don't know of any record of anyone being sent to Prison for Arson (although I don't rule it out). However, there was a Bankruptcy in family and at the time this often involved Prison sentences.

Sometimes stories get confused or exagerated as they pass down the generations, although they often contain at least a kernal of truth.

If you have any further information on the Arson e.g. what was burnt, by whom and when, I would love to investigate it further and I am sure many on others on here would help.

Neil
 

3
The Common Room / Re: tn17's Scavenger Hunt...Everyone Welcome To Join In
« on: Monday 02 October 23 20:32 BST (UK)  »
Elaine,

I think you may be referring to John Burgess (1848-1937), your grand-mothers' grand-father, who lived most of the second half of his life in Kitchener Road, Walthamstow with a second partner who he never married. He was a General Dealer and had 7 children by his second partner, after having 11 by his wife, Susan Martha Harvey. He lost an eye and lived a rather scruffy existence, but he wasn't Irish, or a Gypsy. He was also estranged from some of the children from his first marriage, including my great-grandfather, who only knew that he had left the family home and didn't realise he had set up a new one a few miles away.

The reason that the Burgess' are on here is that some of us are descended from them and have been studying the family history. There are also some who have tried to help answer some of the peculiarities and confusion in the line.

I am happy to share some of what I know, including a photo of John Burgess and his father Richard Burgess if you want to send me a Personal message with your e-mail address.

Neil

4
The Common Room / Re: tn17's Scavenger Hunt...Everyone Welcome To Join In
« on: Thursday 28 September 23 20:20 BST (UK)  »
Hello Elaine,

Richard is your 3 x great-grandfather (Ernest, Charlotte, Richard Burgess, John Burgess, Richard Burgess/Letitia).

Can you expand upon your comment about 'Kent travellers site', I am not quite sure what you mean?

The Burgess family moved to London from Rainham in Kent and their Ancestors came from Maidstone, Kent going back to the 1750's. They seem to have been reasonably wealthy and there is no indication of them being 'travellers'.

Let me know what your sister is referring to and I will see if I can help illuminate the situation.

Neil

5
Worcestershire / Re: Dingley family of Cropthorne
« on: Saturday 09 July 22 08:21 BST (UK)  »
Hello,

I haven't been on here for quite a while, so sorry for the long delay in responding.

There seem to be a number of issues in the line you have posted, so it would be interesting to know where it came from.

A few initial thoughts are that,

1) much of the line before William (father of John Dingley b.1498) looks wrong
2) I am not aware of John Dingley (1498-1541) being a Knight
3) I have never known Henry Dingley (1524-1589) to be given the name Benjamin.
4) I have a death date for Samuel Dingley (b.1682) of 1712 and no known children - however that doesn't mean that is correct, I would need to do some research. I have a number of children for Samuel's father Francis, but no lineage for any of them.

I can start researching back from the earlier records and seeing where that gets to, but do you have any more information on locations or partners for any of the generations after Francis Dingley (1628-1712)?

Cheers.

Neil

6
Family History Beginners Board / Re: Dineley family, charlton manor
« on: Tuesday 23 October 18 17:15 BST (UK)  »
The ones that I know of were an Eleanor that died young (b.1682 d. 1683), another Elaenor - the one mentioned on here (b.1689) and a Frances (b.1680) who married Josiah Dineley.

If you look at the tree that I can see on Geni.com you will see that the dates given are very loose and there are only 3 generations from Elizabeth Goodere (who would have to have been born between 1690 and 1713 when her supposed mother died aged 50) and her grandson William SPENCER b.1792. I suspect this is a case of wishing it to be correct, rather than any evidence that it is.

If you want to send me some details of as far back as you can go with your Spencer’s I am happy to have a look to see if I can find a link backwards from there, but I suspect that there are at least generations missing and probably missattributation too.

Neil

7
Family History Beginners Board / Re: Dineley family, charlton manor
« on: Tuesday 23 October 18 12:31 BST (UK)  »
Samuel Dineley did have a daughter Elizabeth who was born around 1719 and survived into adulthood. However, she is normally attributed as being the same Elizabeth who died a Spinster in 1796. If this attribution is wrong it is possible that it could be the same person, but it may be hard to prove.

8
Family History Beginners Board / Re: Dineley family, charlton manor
« on: Tuesday 23 October 18 12:25 BST (UK)  »
I’m not aware of any sister with the name Elizabeth. What other information is provided to support the claim? Is there an age, baptism, marriage record, Will etc. that can be reviewed?

I am not saying this wrong, but it can be very easy to put two internet trees together and presume they are two halves of a whole when they are actually entirely separate.

Neil

9
Family History Beginners Board / Re: Dineley family, charlton manor
« on: Wednesday 06 September 17 10:17 BST (UK)  »
Sorry I got the election the wrong way around in my previous note.

The original story is outlined by Samuel Foote, the nephew of the two brothers, in his (not always strictly factual) pamphlet "Memoirs of the Life of Sir John Dineley Goodere, Bart.,", but some information from the Historian E.A.B.Barnard from his weekly local history column in the Evesham newspaper published in the first half of the 20th Century matches some of this to Evesham records. My best interpretation of the most likely series of events is,

Samuel had lost his Captaincy in the Navy and was offered the opportunity to get it back from a candidate for the Evesham MP elections in return for getting his brother and father to support the candidate's election (they had considerable influence in the area). Samuel then found out that the candidate was not in a position to do as he promised, so switched his allegiance to a rival candidate. His brother and father, having given their oaths to the first, refused to switch sides, and the three fell out. Samuel resolved to get himself elected Mayor, probably in order to further influence the election, and was duly elected. It seems he got no further success in getting his candidate elected and probably left the area, for he was elected Mayor on 28th August 1733 and was sworn into office on 2nd October. However, records apparently show that, Samuel never sat as Mayor at any of the deliberations of the Council and on 23rd April 1734 John Dineley was sworn in as Mayor. He signed the minutes of a meeting held on the 7th August and remained in office until the following October.

The story of the 'unseating' comes from Foote, but should probably be put in the context of John having been sworn in, due to Samuel's 'not attendance' and Samuel coming back to Evesham and not wanting to accept his eviction. So, on a certain Mayor's Sunday at All Saints Church both brothers led separate parades of their supporters to the church as Mayor. John arrived first, took up position in the Mayor's chair and (after the service started?) Samuel's entourage arrived and Samuel (to quote Foote) " .. ordered his servants, to dethrone Mr. Mayor, which orders were executed": Sir John was removed and the Captain solemnly installed. Further according to Foote, Sir John "... had prudence enough to stifle his resentment and, considering that it was neither a time nor place for wrangleing, sat very contentedly, in an humble place".

Neil

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 6