Don't you think that heir hunters are right to withhold the information that may have cost them a lot of money to find ?
When it comes to situations when they know how much they will gain from an agreement whilst the other party is signing blindly I not sure that is right.
I appreciate that work has been done and a fair price should be paid (Of course heir hunters need to turn a profit, else we wouldn't have any!). My concern is over the high percentage commission on larger estates, an area open to abuse, and the area the tabloids are focussing on.
Do the heir hunter firms itemise their 'work' to the beneficiaries after the event? I would imagine any expenses have to be fully accounted (receipts etc.), but what about the general day to day work?
The number of cases where the value of the estate is known is pretty small, and in those cases most of the major heir hunting firms offer a choice of payment methods from % to time-spent.