Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - lydiaann

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 85
1
Other Countries / Re: Fanny Craven Jamaica
« on: Monday 30 December 24 16:41 GMT (UK)  »
I see I posted this some 9 years ago, and I am STILL totally puzzled as to the lack of information on this lady.  Details, obviously, are still the same.  However, it seems so strange to me that I have many details/documents etc. relating to her 8 siblings...dates of birth/death; marriages; offspring yet there is not a sausage anywhere relating to Fanny.  I am still convinced that her name was Frances if Fanny was a pet name in the family as we have a Nancy and a Hannah included in those siblings.

Does anyone, anywhere, have any suggestion where else I might look. I have tried Family Search but there's nothing there either.  Otherwise, I fear I shall never complete this one family unit.

Happy New Year!

2
Cheshire / Re: Another thorny problem
« on: Wednesday 27 November 24 16:47 GMT (UK)  »
Thank you, amondg, 3 other sibs are Thomas, Edward and Grove.
Graham, a godfather was not actually thought of.  We are still researching so your second suggestion may also come in there.  Thank you, I'll contact the rellie and see what he thinks.

What had puzzled us was the Broadhurst (Betty), wife of Thomas, whom we have not yet connected to the family, though it is obviously the best possibility.  As I told my rellie, new records are coming on line all the time so maybe we'll get an answer later.  It is so easy to assume probabilities - but so disheartening when they turn out not to be true.

Stay warm!

lydiaann

3
Cheshire / Another thorny problem
« on: Wednesday 27 November 24 15:07 GMT (UK)  »
This concerns the family Walton - hold onto your hats, I'll give the details as finely as I possibly can.
This is actually an 'off-shoot' of my main family tree (my late cousin's husband's family), so I've added all the information I was given so I could work on it independently.

We started with Peter Walton, b. Leftwich, Cheshire on 28 Jan, 1857. Married Jessie Buckley, 16 Feb, 1878.  Peter and Jessie had 6 children, 2 of these are important for their second names. 
Hannah BROADHURST Walton, 1881-1882 and Frank BROADHURST Walton, 1892-? (This family appears to be complete at this point, so any extra info is of no matter just now).

Peter left for Canada sometime after 1911 and died there in 1939. His death certificate apparently gives his parents as William Walton and Elizabeth Lewton.  My rellie could find only a marriage certificate in the name of William Walton and Elizabeth Newton (Manchester 1848).  This is where the research unravels.

Because of 2 children of Peter having the middle name BROADHURST, my rellie had originally (i.e., before the discovery of the death registration) pegged Peter's parents as Thomas Walton and Elizabeth (Betty) Broadhurst, which would make sense.  However, William's marriage certificate shows his father as being William Walton (since then, Mary Lowe has been a possible for this Wm's wife), no mention of a Thomas.

I've dug around as many possibilities as possible, going sideways, upwards and downwards but can find no reference in Peter/Wm/Wm Sr's families with the name Broadhurst.  As we can find no records pertaining to Wm Sr or Thomas Walton (1786-1855) with regard to parents, etc., I wondered whether any Chatters might have, or be able to find, any more information.  I think my rellie's question is not so much going further back, but why BROADHURST in Peter's 2 children?  I have suggested that possible Thomas was Wm Sr's brother and his wife a favoured member of the family, but that would mean the Broadhurst name was 2 generations down, not one as would be usual. 

Any suggestions as to how to proceed would be most gratefully received.

I apologise if this is somewhat garbled but it's the best I can do, please berate me if I have missed important info that should have been included.

thanks in advance

lydiaann

4
Dumfriesshire / Re: Dunscore, Dumfriesshire
« on: Saturday 09 November 24 14:45 GMT (UK)  »
Thankyou, 2Harriet.  I was on holiday for the first 10 days of October and only just go round to checking this.  It seems you have provided several hours' worth of 'hunt and peck' around these names.  It also appears that the majority of Dumfriesshire was divided up into 'estates', there is so much to mull upon here; definitely a stay-at-home, sit by the radiator type of job.  And all just for the sake of one antecedent!!  Still, if I should chance upon a hit, I may be able to trace in more detail.

Thank you, again...and I hope hubby is enjoying a well-earned retirement.  Being a Roofer is a hard-enough job, what it's like in NE Scotland with all that weather is difficult to imagine!!

5
Derbyshire / Re: Derbyshire or Lincolnshire? *COMPLETED THANKS*
« on: Friday 20 September 24 16:41 BST (UK)  »
As I had already 'completed' this topic, I didn't return to it until today while searching for another Craven item.  Comberton, thank you so much for that.  I remember my grandfather's funeral (I am the Miss J. Taylor in the article) - it was a beautiful day and I had turned 20 just 17 days prior to his death.  As the household had consisted of just granddad, my mum and me (big brothers were away from home, one in London and one in the Army in Hong Kong), we were 'lost' for quite a while! So many memories...and I am pleased to say all happy! 

6
The Common Room / Re: Heir Hunters.....Just Wondering?
« on: Friday 23 August 24 16:24 BST (UK)  »
All this talk about wills reminds me of my late brother and prompts me to remind people of something very important.

My big brother (BB) and his wife of 30 years separated (aside: he should not have waited 30 days to get rid of her!). He eventually met a young lady - 25 years difference in age! - and then had to wait for nearly 5 years as his wife kept NOT signing the divorce papers, despite the courts putting everything through with a lot in her favour. However, as soon as BB really settled in with his (later) wife and she fell pregnant, he made a will that was watertight against wifey no. 1 claiming his Military Pension (which she had threatened).  Child was born and, 6 years later, no. 2 joined them.  They were deliriously happy.  One week after No. 2's 6th birthday and the day before Father's Day, BB died suddenly, such a shock to all concerned as he had not been ill.  And here comes the problem.  BB did not know (still surprises me) and no-one told him that, on his marriage, his will was null and void and he should have made a new one - even if it was exactly the same.  Fortunately, my SIL had a very good lawyer but it still took around 3 months for the courts to acknowledge that the intention was there that she should inherit.  Fortunately, the current account was in joint names so that automatically transferred to her; however, as her first child was seriously challenged, she was unable to work and for that time she was only receiving government allowances for herself and the children.  As usual, the insurance companies took their time - and one of the holiday insurance companies (they were due to go 6 weeks later) kept asking for more and more documentation until she got lawyers to demand it for her.

So here is the warning: if you have a will and you enter into a new marriage, that will is INVALID. Having seen the stress that SIL was under on top of grieving and ensuring the children were well (in fact, as with my other SIL, it is apparent that widowed parents of young children do not have an opportunity to grieve properly until their children have gone through the process and 'come out the other end'), I beg you to tell anyone who might be affected in this way to do the right thing.  One never knows what will happen.

And to my two beautiful BBs, still miss you so - RIP.




7
Derbyshire / Re: Derbyshire or Lincolnshire? *COMPLETED, THANKS*
« on: Saturday 17 August 24 17:08 BST (UK)  »
Wow, that was quick! Thank you so much for that, Bumble.  That came out of left field!  I had become so used to talk of Derbyshire, but it was always Tissington, Foremark, Kedleston, Ashby-de-la-Zouche,Ticknall, etc. - but never this.  I'm guessing he - and also probably Andrew Jr - was on the estate at Donington Hall.  However, it shows that I am correct in thinking he moved in 1920 as my mum had said they lived in Woodhall Spa for 8 years.

Andrew's - and thus Lydia's - life was that of a 'wanderer', moving from estate to estate.  I know that while he was at Foremark Hall (1910s) he also joined the shoots at Calke and Kedleston.  (Presumably, the owners of these estates 'shared' their keepers to act as beaters/assistants at the major shoots.)  And I know that he was highly regarded, according to my grandmother - citing gifts given, care packages if the children were ill, etc. so it wasn't a case of being thrown out regularly!!

So, you have joined up my dots.  Thank you so much, I am very grateful for that.

lydiaann

8
Derbyshire / Derbyshire or Lincolnshire? *COMPLETED THANKS*
« on: Saturday 17 August 24 16:15 BST (UK)  »
I wonder if some kind soul would be good enough to look up a location for me, please, as I don't have access to the 1921 census.  I am trying to complete the timeline of my grandfather and am not sure whether he had already moved from Lincolnshire. He was in Ticknall as Gamekeeper to Sir Francis Burdett in 1912 but in Kirkstead, Woodhall Spa in 1913 as gamekeeper to Rev. C. T. Moore (his cottage is still occupied but much altered since then!) After 1913, there don't seem to be any Directory entries until 1925 when he is back in Derbyshire, this time in Tissington, Gamekeeper to H. J. Wigram.

Andrew Craven, b. 1881 Banchory-Ternan, Kincardineshire, Gamekeeper
family:
Lydia Craven (nee Houghton), b. 1881 Melbourne, Derbyshire.
Andrew Harris Craven, b. 1905 Foremark, Derbyshire
Dorothy Eleanor Craven, b. 1906 Milton, Derbyshire (reg. in Burton)
Gwendoline Mary Craven, b. 1910 Milton, Derbyshire (re. in Burton)

It is possible that Andrew Harris may have been at the same address as he, too, became a Gamekeeper. I believe Dorothy Eleanor (my mum) may already have left home to become an apprentice with Affleck & Brown in Manchester, but Gwendoline Mary would have been with her parents.

Andrew and Lydia retired in 1947, moving once again to Woodhall Spa - where my mum brought me and my 2 older brothers to live with them when my father died in 1951.  As I said, this one move should complete the circle of my grandad's life and I would be eternally grateful if I could just have even the village where he was in 1921. 

Thanks in hope, Chatters.

9
The Common Room / Re: Married women occupations in the UK 1841 census
« on: Saturday 17 August 24 14:02 BST (UK)  »
Wasn't the 1841 census very restricted anyway? On some I have they don't even record the Head of Household's occupation, although I have to admit that is very rarely.  I know the age of under 20s is very confusing, trying to work out whether you have the right person when they could have been born up to 4+ years earlier!  And on Ancestry, when entering an 1841 census for one person, it doesn't give you the chance to enter all the rest in that family...in a time when some of my predecessors had rather large families, it can be very time-consuming!

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 85