Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Ians1900

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 31
1
Armed Forces / Re: Help to reveal regiment WW1
« on: Tuesday 23 May 23 12:32 BST (UK)  »
I cannot see enough of the shoulder titles, so this could either be Royal Artillery or Royal Field Artillery.

2
Armed Forces / Re: Minimum Age to join the british Army in 1886 ?
« on: Tuesday 23 May 23 12:14 BST (UK)  »
The minimum age at that time was fourteen to join as a 'boy' and eighteen to join as a man. Earlier during the American War of Independence there are instances of 'boys' being aged ten and twelve. Often under eighteens would lie about their ages in order to obtain a 'man's pay', but consequently if they did anything wrong they would either keep quiet and take a man's punishment or confess and have to pay back their pay and perhaps be discharged. Two of my ancestors lied about their ages and one was flogged aged just seventeen.

Boys would work as an apprentice does, but learning how to soldier. Some would be drummers and buglers, some would do other work and your ancestor was chosen to be a tailor. Each Regiment had its own Sergeant Master Tailor assisted by several lower ranks. As adults they would also be part of the Regiment's fighting force, but as a boy your ancestor would not. In battle they would if possible be kept in camp assisting with various jobs, except for buglers who would be with an officer on the firing line.

Enrolled or enlisted is simply a choice of words and there is no distinction between them.

So, your ancestor would have probably continued to be a Regimental tailor.

I hope this helps.

3
Armed Forces / Re: Help identifying this uniform please
« on: Saturday 29 April 23 00:17 BST (UK)  »
No, it's a Chief Petty Officer. Cuff Buttons do not feature on Petty Officer uniforms.

4
Armed Forces / Re: Walter Boiling - Boer War
« on: Friday 17 June 22 17:44 BST (UK)  »
Hi,

As you say, his name simply appears in amongst a list of other names. Contrary to popular belief, it does not follow that every military person mentioned in despatches did something in particular, on a certain day and which was worthy of note or explanation, especially with private soldiers. When someone is mentioned in despatches and their name is recorded in this way, it simply means that they were outstanding in their role, in this case, your ancestor came to the attention of his company commander (An officer) who thought so much of him that he recommended that the Regiment's Commanding Officer include him in a list of men worthy of being mentioned in a General's Despatches for outstanding work.

Be confident that your ancestor was an outstanding soldier.


5
Armed Forces / Re: Help identifying this uniform
« on: Thursday 31 March 22 18:34 BST (UK)  »
Thank you very much indeed. I'm happy to go with that, as I've just been updated with a family story where it was believed thatit he served in the Boer War with the Black Watch and that he was born in Tranmere, Cheshire in 1870. Now I can see if I can find his service record.

Great timing. Thank you.

6
Armed Forces / Re: Help identifying this uniform
« on: Thursday 31 March 22 17:37 BST (UK)  »
Thank you very much everyone

7
Armed Forces / Re: Help identifying this uniform
« on: Thursday 31 March 22 15:58 BST (UK)  »
Thank you. May I ask do you think that from the sporran or something else?

8
Armed Forces / Re: Help identifying this uniform
« on: Thursday 31 March 22 15:48 BST (UK)  »
As I said, I only have his name, so I'm trying to establish a regiment and go from there.

9
Armed Forces / Re: Help identifying this uniform
« on: Thursday 31 March 22 15:14 BST (UK)  »
Still not sure about either. I'm more inclined to think Martini Henry bayonet rather than a Lee Metford.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 31