Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - kellykid

Pages: [1]
1
Australia / Re: 1895, 1900, 1903 Queensland Electoral Rolls Look up Please!
« on: Wednesday 11 February 09 23:19 GMT (UK)  »
Hi Sherry

Common-law marriage did happen back then in Australia. There are a number of reasons that may be possibilities:
Robert was older than Mary and was around 31 when he came to Australia if your 1880 is correct.
Robert may have been married previously and may have been estranged from his wife and therefore unable to remarry unless he divorced or his 1st wife predeceased him.
Robert may have come to Australia ahead of his family with plans for them to follow which did not eventuate.
Common-law marriages also existed where the couple were from different religious backgrounds.
Divorce was uncommon and not really an option for Irish Catholics - not sure whether either party was Catholic but it may be a consideration.
Many couples, particularly where children resulted from the union, lived as husband and wife and the woman took the name of the man to avoid the scrutiny and scorn of the community.
I have a number of these unions in my tree. Some couples never married and several married after the first spouse died.
I hope that helps.
Mary-Ellen

2
Australia / Re: 1895, 1900, 1903 Queensland Electoral Rolls Look up Please!
« on: Wednesday 11 February 09 17:55 GMT (UK)  »
Hi Sherry

Here are the details from the 1903 Electoral Roll:

Robert James WRIGHT, M, Connor Street, carrier, Emu Park, Capricornia
Mary Johns WRIGHT, F, Connor Street, domestic duties, Emu Park, Capricornia

There is only one ANGWIN on the 1903 roll, not sure if he is connected to you:
William ANGWIN, M, Boorara Station, labourer, Boorara, Maranoa

You won't find details for Mary on earlier rolls as women were only eligible to vote for the first time in December of 1903 in the first Federal Election. If I get a chance I will check at the library next time I am there for Robert James WRIGHT on the earlier rolls. Sometimes men did not appear on the rolls either - the CD for 1895 has the following information:
'In the 19th century, any male aged 21 years or over, who occupied a house,
warehouse or shop, who earned 25 pounds or more, or who had held a miner's
licence for six months, was entitled to vote'.
So many rules....

Cheers
Mary-Ellen

Pages: [1]