2
« on: Monday 20 October 08 09:14 BST (UK) »
Hi Glen
That is all very helpful. It would make sense that Harriet married Thomas Robins as that would be why the son was called Thomas too. It would also make sense if Harriet and Thomas didn't marry until Dec qrt of 1854 why Thomas Brook was called Brook. On his birth certificate there is no father mentioned. That would then make the connection to William and Barbary being his grandparents. I wonder what made Thomas and Harriet go to Eastbourne and leave their son with grandparents. I'll investigate that one further. It would also clear up the mystery of why there is so much confusion between the Brook family and Robins. As i think i mentioned before if you look at the 1891 census Thomas (1854) who married Elizabeth Saunders was listed as a Robins. No wonder it has all taken so long to figure out. I think i might order up the cert for Thomas Robins and Harriet for my records. My Mum is going to love it all. She is the Brook and direct descendent she has been in Spain for a month but gets back on Wednesday, we have been puzzling over all this for at least a couple of months. I have certainly had my money's worth out of Ancestry.
When my Great grandfather was born Charles John (Thomas and Elizabeth son) Barbary Robins was present at the birth and is listed on his birth certificate. For quite some time we wondered whether she was the local midwife before we put together all the intermarriages between the families.
Thank you so much for your help. I will list it all now and try and add to my tree in the right order. I do like the GR one so that i can see it all laid out but obviously Ancestry gives you more in connecting census records etc.
If I can send you any info for your records please let me know.
Regards
Helen
As you say the Workhouse was a busy place in those days wasn't it.