1
The Common Room / Re: Relationship ?
« on: Tuesday 05 November 19 16:01 GMT (UK) »
Gadget, 
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
The Common Room / Re: Relationship ?
« on: Tuesday 05 November 19 08:26 GMT (UK) »
Chris 49,
"I like this one much better"
So do I, thanks,
pete
Gadget, When?
"I like this one much better"
So do I, thanks,
pete
Gadget, When?
3
The Common Room / Re: Relationship ?
« on: Sunday 03 November 19 15:48 GMT (UK) »
Thanks for your replies,
Mckha489,
I have seen that chart before and thank you for showing it, but, being a thicky, can't get my head round it,
as my teachers used to say, "Must try harder"
chris, Thanks mate, that makes my head spin,
I'm calling him a Second Cousin whether he likes it or not!
pete
Mckha489,
I have seen that chart before and thank you for showing it, but, being a thicky, can't get my head round it,
as my teachers used to say, "Must try harder" chris, Thanks mate, that makes my head spin,
I'm calling him a Second Cousin whether he likes it or not!
pete
4
The Common Room / Re: Relationship ?
« on: Saturday 02 November 19 19:29 GMT (UK) »
Thanks a lot, knew somebody on here would know,
just found me a 2nd Cousin I didn't know about
just found me a 2nd Cousin I didn't know about
5
The Common Room / Relationship ?
« on: Saturday 02 November 19 18:15 GMT (UK) »
Hiya folks, in a kerfuffle again, can't get my head round this
can someone solve this (probably simple) puzzle?
If A is the Grandson of B & D is the Grandson of C
With B & C being Sisters,
What is the relationship between A & D?
T.I.A.
Pete
can someone solve this (probably simple) puzzle?
If A is the Grandson of B & D is the Grandson of C
With B & C being Sisters,
What is the relationship between A & D?
T.I.A.
Pete
6
The Common Room / Re: 1939 Register
« on: Thursday 12 September 19 08:59 BST (UK) »
Boo, Thank you very much for your time and effort.
Your theory's are facts! researching my own notes from a few years ago, which I thought were lost,
all ties in.
The marriage of James & Mary in 1955 is James's 2nd, he "split "from his 1st wife sometime between 1913(the D.o B. of his 1st Son) & the birth of Joseph in 1926, his 1st marriage was dissolved about 1954, his 1st wife went on to re-marry in 1955,
So, to my reckoning, James's Son from his 1st marriage (my Dad) is half Brother to Joseph & Norah, making their offspring my Half Cousins, some of which may be still living, or doesn't this count with the illegitimacy problem?
Once again,
Thank you very much
pete
Your theory's are facts! researching my own notes from a few years ago, which I thought were lost,
all ties in.
The marriage of James & Mary in 1955 is James's 2nd, he "split "from his 1st wife sometime between 1913(the D.o B. of his 1st Son) & the birth of Joseph in 1926, his 1st marriage was dissolved about 1954, his 1st wife went on to re-marry in 1955,
So, to my reckoning, James's Son from his 1st marriage (my Dad) is half Brother to Joseph & Norah, making their offspring my Half Cousins, some of which may be still living, or doesn't this count with the illegitimacy problem?
Once again,
Thank you very much
pete
7
The Common Room / Re: 1939 Register
« on: Wednesday 11 September 19 21:07 BST (UK) »
Looks like piccie attachment didn't work, back to the learning
pete
PS yes it did, must be tired, can't concentrate
pete
PS yes it did, must be tired, can't concentrate
8
The Common Room / Re: 1939 Register
« on: Wednesday 11 September 19 20:53 BST (UK) »
More info, Norah was married to Webb 1946, so that will be what the alteration means.
There's so much more info available since I last started researching that I'm having to learn all over again.
Thanks for reading and for replies
pete
PS. Emeltom, and JenB sorry, I was typing this when you replied, seems like the M is sorted, Thank you, but who would have altered the others?
There's so much more info available since I last started researching that I'm having to learn all over again.
Thanks for reading and for replies
pete
PS. Emeltom, and JenB sorry, I was typing this when you replied, seems like the M is sorted, Thank you, but who would have altered the others?
9
The Common Room / Re: 1939 Register
« on: Wednesday 11 September 19 20:41 BST (UK) »
Thanks for the information, on looking again (with my specs on) the entry is ONA M, which is Stoke on Trent, the area I need.
I'm attaching a picture of the entry, I hope, any further info welcome.
I'm attaching a picture of the entry, I hope, any further info welcome.