1
The Common Room / Re: Merchant Navy Fatalities Death Certificates
« on: Today at 09:51 »
In the circumstances of his death, no death certificate would have been issued. Merchant seamen's deaths during the World Wars were recorded by different authorities — the GRO system (births, marriages, deaths registered in England and Wales) applied only to deaths on land.
The recording of Merchant Navy deaths at sea was the responsibility of the master of the ship and was recorded in the ship's Official Log Book, Casualty and Death List. Certainly, problems arose with the recording of casualties at sea when a ship was lost with all hands. In these circumstances the owners would submit the copy of the crew list that had been retained on shore (the 'Red Copy') to the RGSS — these lists were then used for the registration of the deaths of the crews. We can still see today the problems that have arisen from the non-commemoration of some merchant seamen missed by the relevant authorities and also the CWGC. In these cases, evidence has still to be provided that a seaman was actually lost at sea and, indeed, that the loss was attributed to enemy action or increased war risk.
The fact that he is commemorated by the CWGC means there is no doubt that his death was recognised as a war casualty.
Looking at Andy's link above it appears that route may give you some answers but by no means will every merchant seaman's death at sea be recorded against a ship name.
Hugh
The recording of Merchant Navy deaths at sea was the responsibility of the master of the ship and was recorded in the ship's Official Log Book, Casualty and Death List. Certainly, problems arose with the recording of casualties at sea when a ship was lost with all hands. In these circumstances the owners would submit the copy of the crew list that had been retained on shore (the 'Red Copy') to the RGSS — these lists were then used for the registration of the deaths of the crews. We can still see today the problems that have arisen from the non-commemoration of some merchant seamen missed by the relevant authorities and also the CWGC. In these cases, evidence has still to be provided that a seaman was actually lost at sea and, indeed, that the loss was attributed to enemy action or increased war risk.
The fact that he is commemorated by the CWGC means there is no doubt that his death was recognised as a war casualty.
Looking at Andy's link above it appears that route may give you some answers but by no means will every merchant seaman's death at sea be recorded against a ship name.
Hugh
