Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Pudding1

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 9
1
Warwickshire / Re: Re: LINK: Warwickshire prisoners database
« on: Tuesday 21 August 12 13:00 BST (UK)  »
Thanks for posting this website, I'm pretty sure I've found something relating to my ancestors ... as a victim, I hasten to add!  ;D

I've copied down all the reference information but it's not clear where I go now.  Does anyone know?

Many thanks,

Janet

2
Warwickshire / Re: BENNETT family of Birmingham - marble masons
« on: Saturday 24 September 11 16:23 BST (UK)  »
Here's the only George Henry Bennett I could find in the online Warwickshire Parish Registers; the date and the place are close but don't match exactly.  However, ages are sometimes off and I've been lead astray previously by a child being born in one location but baptised in his mother's parish!

Regards,

Janet

3
Cheshire / Re: Children of Thomas Brereton and Ann
« on: Tuesday 26 July 11 08:15 BST (UK)  »
Hi Rotosis -

Your mother is right!  The 1881 Census showed a total of only 1,243 Breretons in the entire UK, with a significant majority living in or emanating from Cheshire.  Even 10 years ago, only 54 in one million had Brereton as a surname.  Statistically speaking, the low number and location means that we are all related.

Chronologically, any of the three sons of my Thomas and Ann could conceivably be the father of your ancestor.  The original family holdings were around Malpas and Dodleston, roughly 25 miles away from Bartholmey (forgive me, I don't know where you are located so don't know if you are familiar with the area).  Such a distance would not be unreasonable if your ancestor was a younger son of a younger son as he would most likely not have inherited land around in this area and had to go off to seek his fortune.  Cetainly none of it came down to my family!

The Breretons are probably the most interesting of all my family connections so I'm happy to help!

Janet

4
Cheshire / Re: Children of Thomas Brereton and Ann
« on: Monday 25 July 11 13:21 BST (UK)  »
I have Breretons in my family tree, but the dates look to be a generation out.

Thomas Brereton, born 1726 in Dodleston, Chesire, son of Randle Brereton and his wife Mary (maiden name currently unknown).  He married Ann Hocknell, born about 1736, on 2nd February 1758 in Acton, Cheshire (Familysearch 4008455).

Their known children, born / christened in either Acton or Dodleston:

Mary (born 1759), my 4x great grandmother married Samuel Moulton
Randle (1762)
Thomas (1766)
James (1769)
Joseph (1772)

Although initially it looks promising, Randle is actually quite a popular name in that family, relating back to Sir Randolph (or Randle) who fought for Henry VII and by 1504 was the Chamberlain of Cheshire.

However, its usage does suggest that we share common ancestry (as opposed to the other common names) so happy to help.  I'll have a look at some options coming down from my Thomas and Ann but it may be a  day or two before I can do some research.

Regards,

Janet

5
Cheshire / Re: elizabeth connelly born 1873 birkenhead
« on: Monday 25 July 11 13:10 BST (UK)  »
Have you tried using www.lostcousins.com? If you enter the details you have for an ancestor in the 1881 Census, it matches you with others who have also listed the same census record, thus leading to descendants who may have "missing" information (ie from a family bible) or photographs to share.

If nothing else, I've found Peter's newsletter full of handy hints and tips for family tree research ... and a cracking read!

Janet

6
Cheshire / Re: Weaver "Flats'
« on: Monday 25 July 11 12:52 BST (UK)  »
Hi JohnJean -

I've contacted the Ellesmere Boat Museum and visited the Maritime Museum in search of much the same information for my ancestor's flats "Asia", "Jonah" and "Merrie England".  Unfortunately, they seem to concentrate on larger vessels so it seems like Odessa's details are your best bet for following up information (as ever, Odessa has been incredibly helpful to my research!).

Best regards,

Janet

7
Lancashire Lookup Requests / Re: Lookup: Flixton Parish Registers
« on: Monday 25 July 11 12:38 BST (UK)  »
Thanks for all your help, Barbara!   ;D


8
Lancashire Lookup Requests / Re: Lookup: Flixton Parish Registers
« on: Monday 25 July 11 07:53 BST (UK)  »
Thanks, Barbara -

I think it's now reached the stage where it's gong to be really complicated to sort them out!  If the register doesn't mention occupations (and even then, the chances of repetition would be high) or the mother's name, there may be no way of knowing which is which.

I haven't yet looked for the will but I have managed to determine all the vicar's children and one other grandchild (William, son of James).  So, for now, I'll treat them as separate families with the assumption that the relationship goes further back (my father being highly sceptical that anyone in his family would have been that religious!).

Would the easiest place to research the Bowden / Carrington registers be in Chester?

Best regards,

Janet

9
Lancashire Lookup Requests / Re: Lookup: Flixton Parish Registers
« on: Monday 18 July 11 11:57 BST (UK)  »
Hello Barbara and Allan -

This information is invaluable, thank you very much!

I'm currently leaning towards Mary christened 1719, died 1766, daughter of Thomas, sister of Lydia for the following reasons:

    I have a copy of the will her son James wrote in 1789; given that he named each of his children, their spouses and his wife, I am assuming that his mother would have been included had she been alive.

    I have a Thomas Penny in my tree, son of James Penny and brother of Robert, born 12th November 1692; all were residents of Great Bowden and Thomas is of an age where he COULD be Mary's father, though the only information I had for him are his birth and christening dates.  He was one of the individuals I gathered after reading the will for James, vicar of Great Budworth in the late 17th century.

Geographically speaking, would this be realistic, or too much of a stretch for the times?

Although I can't lay my hands on the source at the moment, I'm sure James contuinued to refer to his mother as Mary Penny, so I didn't expect to see a marriage for her.

Though Mary is far too common a name for my liking, the elderly Mary buried in 1752 is of the right age to be Thomas' mother and wife of James.  Unfortunately, my system crashed last summer and I lost my transcript so I'll now have to go and dig out details of James' will  However if memory serves, he left the equivalent of over £250k in today's money so to my mind, it is unlikely, though not impossible, that his widow would be a pauper.

Speculating purely on ages, James, son of Reginald seems to be a good starting point for the father.  I'll use this information as my theories for now and try to prove and / or disprove from onine sources but I'm very much looking forward to anything that comes out of the Flixton transcripts.

Best regards,

Janet

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 9